Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Date

1-2pm

Attendees

Not attending

  • everyone attended

Future agenda items

Discussion items

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Review vanguard decision

Confirm that Ex Libris can support UC

10

UCSB, UCB, UCLA, UCSD, UCSF + CDL

What are the risks? Would Ex Libris push back? If so, what would they suggest?

  • Caitlin: UCSB small, already on Alma Primo; UCB (Millennium) and UCLA (Voyager) large and each has a RLF; UCSD (Millenium) includes SCP; UCSF (Millenium) small, grad students and medical students, Millennium user; Plus the CDL. Will be recommending this tomorrow. What kind of risk does this mean for us, and how would we mitigate it?

  • Maria: should be OK. robust cross section of data records. ExL will support UC if problems arise.

  • Caitlin: if we need to reduce, we could move UCSF. But, they are pretty small.

  • Carlo: two largest repositories UCB and UCLA

2

Review timeline

Get more details on the timeline to support meeting milestones

20

  • When are the hand offs between on boarding and vanguard?

  • What dates are set in stone?

  • What tasks are dependencies for which milestones?

  • Will there be checklists for particular major milestones (i.e. Vanguard test load)?

3

Questions

General questions to post

  • What is our architecture?

  • What goes in the Network Zone, what doesn’t?

  • How does SCP acquisition work happen?

  • What entities need to get represented in the system? (labs, libraries, branches, etc.)

4

5

6

TOTAL

/ 60

  • No labels