Process for cataloging records with a different OCLC number than the record loaded into the NZ is still causing a lot of headaches. (If you mark the record for deletion first and then copy to catalog, the deletion note comes along. Then when you share with network and you match on a record, the option to link disappears once you view it and you need to go back to click “Link.” People are struggling and I’ve had to clean up a lot of dupes.
Answer from ExL on 880s in merge rules was essentially “nope.” They advise working in Alma and exporting to OCLC. Also “the merge rules sometimes result in duplicate fields because of how the rules are interacting with the individual records before they merge. The best way of resolving it is usually to allow the merge to complete and use norm rules to clean up the duplicates.”
Had first meeting of bound-with group. Looking at “host bibliographic” method or linking first title in volume to subsequent titles.
Need to start thinking about publishing--to OCLC (for SRLF holdings), Hathi, etc.
2
Update on boundwiths
While the IZ delete job can find related records just fine, the NZ one doesn’t, regardless of which model is used to create the boundwith.
We do need to add some kind of note if we don’t want the records to get deleted during batch jobs at CDL.
3
WorldCat updates
Do we still want to start these for non-serials on 9/20?
From Hermine: We’re not ready yet! Outstanding issues for UCLA:
035 cleanup
Gathering sets of records to protect from overlay
Figuring out bound-with records to mark with 910s
4
856 41 removal
For campuses who have 41s they want to preserve, can they be identified?
5
MVP items
Review outstanding items, see if the timeline still makes sense