Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 3
Next »
Date: July 23, 2020
Zoom:
Attendees
Not attending: Lynda, Katherine, Mary
Discussion items
| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
|---|
| 1 | Caitlin Nelson presentation | Discuss SILS Communication networks; | 35 | Caitlin | Role of ELGs and shared governance; communication between teams; migration work timeline; strategies for discussion coordination with other functional groups
|
|
|
| 2 | Q/A | | 15 | Danelle/Caitlin | Each campus’s rep on each functional group should be representing the needs of Spec Coll and Archives. Thus, SC&A-specific concerns should be accounted for by the FG members, even if these reps do not specifically work within SC&A. The EL groups are not designed to be consulted on every decision, rather, they are designed to mitigate conflict in decision-making. Campuses have been asked to develop a test plan for their campus by end of August to review the test data in vanguard. Implementation coordinators are the leads on developing each local campus test plan, and FG reps are leads on developing test plans for system-wide concerns. Vanguard data will be available in September.
| | |
| 3 | parking lot | new issues for future discussion Total | x/x | | | | |
Future agenda items