Date
11:00 AM
Attendees
Mark Marrow , UC Berkeley
Jason Newborn , UC Davis
Linda Michelle Weinberger , UC Irvine
Sahra Klawitter , UC Riverside
Micquel Little (Unlicensed) , UC San Francisco
Scott Hathaway , UC Santa Barbara
Joseph Ferrie , California Digital Library
Kristen Cardoso (Unlicensed), UC Santa Cruz
Judea D'Arnaud, UC San Diego
Joe Ameen , UCM (Liaison) NOTE TAKER
Absent
Discussion items
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Check-in/ Updates | PPC meeting updates and review of any action items from last meeting Quick share of any local team updates | All |
|
| |||
| 2 | Name choices so far | EUNS (naming subgroup) would like our group's feedback on their name choices so far. Copy of the proposal from EUNS (the naming subgroup): https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1fhpxawdGc61ra24PUkGb_c83LK3S5HLGb3NeQ0m_9L4/edit (please don't actually edit!) | 20 | Caitlyn | This is the patron-facing name of “SILS”. Final proposal will go to the WG on January 8. The group has worked up four options: “Minimalist” Library Search, Eureka, Beacon, UC LibHub This subgroup is looking for feedback. There has not been much time for gathering feedback from various stakeholder groups. Additional information: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19PPeV7cOA8T-gm7KCoA96aNW9l-6ce56 Feedback content: Do you have any general comments or feedback on the choices in the proposal? Do you have any questions about the choices in the proposal? Did you have a favorite approach / option? Tell us which and why you thought so. Did you have strong objections to a particular approach or option? Tell us which and why you thought so. | |||
| 3 | New Decision Pages to Consider | https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/l/c/YzmkPQqP , https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/l/c/wd2zje6n | Joe | Decision pages are currently blank. -Do we want to have any policies around individual institutions configuring Peer-to-Peer partners. -Resource Sharing configuration may need to be done during Test phase. | ||||
| 4 | Answers to Questions about End User Communications | Review the answers we’re preparing to send to End User Outreach | All | Joe worked up some answers to questions received from the end user communications group. We may need to test how patrons can pick up items from different locations (campuses). This may impact whether or not we suppress the AFN button for locally held items. | ||||
| 5 | Group Testing Session | We’ll be spending this meeting testing together. Supplier of Last Resort Test (Test and Implementation) Strategy for Resource Sharing with WorldShare ILL https://docs.google.com/document/d/15JkA3P8hBqoVmxswqNIsCX1evnOBywujk7CHyclL2b0/edit https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bUjEXKsrlnxASwoYzjm-DmZNpAAnxUge5eR0o9rXDsI/edit#gid=103680270 https://drive.google.com/drive/u/3/folders/1S_UJPBKDBbhIr2C-jEi05_r4076SkQJE?ths=true | All | Testing supplier of last resort with a UCLA request. UCSD passed on fulfilling. Borrowing request should go to VDX. It doesn’t look like the request was transferred to VDX. It looks like requests need to be initiated in the Resource Sharing form. Going through the Get It form turns it into a direct fulfillment request. The request is hitting the log so the e-mail is being sent. It is not getting through to VDX. Joe will troubleshoot. |
| |||
| 6 | Parking Lot | There are some questions around what other things this group might add to the parking lot. Expiration dates and whatnot.
| Members can add to the parking lot issues that they feel need to be considered or tracked. | |||||
| 7 | RLF Non-Circ items requestable for in-house use | Will need to test in Test Phase | There are some hacks used for library-use only items that can’t be checked out and back in because it will kick off a return process. This will have to be figured out for ExL. Davis tried creating a “Reading Room” circulation room. This was difficult for circulation staff to manage. There is now a transit step between ILL and the circ desks that allows the item to be checked out again before initiating the return process. | |||||
| 8 | RLF Ghost Records Discussion | This decision will be worked out throughout the test phase. | ||||||
| 9 | DDS Decision Page (Test Load) Document Delivery Service (DDS) Setup Config forms - local campuses | Will need to be tested during the Test Phase |
| |||||
| 10 | Harmonization work | Continue our discussion and come up with loan periods to propose for fulfillment network/locally https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-W2psaW6GsgOTD1ByTHRF00bikcnVR6W/edit#gid=1939968629 | ||||||
| 11 | Total | x/x |
Future agenda items
Form requested by Ex Libris: what is our role in completing the form? what is the role of local implementation teams? (see https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MbLg08j5grFfaCMGQ9Pde1UBmw06UAqf/view?usp=sharing )
Discussion with Discovery team about naming/labeling of UC Interlibrary Loan button.
Should we modify our decision page to recommend “Lender of last resort” as the preferred ILL integration model.
SILS ILL CKG and/or town hall resource sharing demo.