Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees

...

Not attending

  •  

Roles

...

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Welcome

Catch-up and gather together

3 min

all



2

Announcements

Inform

2 min

all

For now, continue to meet on Mondays from 10am to 11am (selected weeks).

Respond to a new poll regarding our availability for a new meeting time. (All)

3

Discussion topic: open access discovery

Check-in on each groups' progress toward writing a summary of conversations and findings related to open access discovery issues for the decision page

15 min

Document for reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l0a2gvpbaOsmJPLVmRGXWnIbkmvztpl7E3M8tgUJ2rQ/edit?usp=sharing

Framework for discussion: How did the subgroup work go?

  • Philosophy of discovery layer - questions and thoughts developed by PSELG (Rikke, Miquel)

  • UC OA cataloging policy (Cynthia, Sarah Troy)

  • CDI - questions developed by PSELG (Sara Davidson Squibb, Beth D)

  • Summary (Rikke)

Reframe the PSELG OA Discovery document with specific recommendations.

Note: Mini-teams have finished adding information to the Google document.

Start to modify the PSELG OA Discovery document into a new format. Include recommendations post-PPC meeting (Feb. 12th). *See potential recommendation wording in item #4 - Decisions. (Beth)

Share revision with PSELG members for comment. (Beth)

Respond to revised PSELG OA Discovery document, with recommendations, provided by Beth. (All)

4

Recommendation

Outcomes for a cross-functional task-group

15 min

all

Framework for discussion: In short, using the SILS governance framework and existing UC Common Knowledge Group structure, PSELG recommends the formation of a cross-functional task-group including representatives from scholarly communication, technical services, and public services domains to ????

  • What outcomes does PSELG recommend a cross-functional task-group achieve?

Ask PPC clarifying questions for our work.

Articulate two potential recommendations:

  1. Form a group with Discovery and eResources representatives to investigate and recommend  how the Central Discovery Index (CDI) should be managed, including available OA resources, in a way that delivers an optimal user experience and offers a feasible/practical workflow.

 

2. What should be the priorities of shared cataloging in light of the Central Discovery Index (CDI)? OR What are the practical implications of CDI on shared cataloging practices, whether OA resources or other materials?

Ask questions of PPC at Feb. 12th meeting. (Beth C.)

  1. Who manages CDI at go-live?

  2. Who decides what is turned on and turned off in the CDI?

Highlight - in purple - other questions to be asked at the PCC meeting by Wednesday, (Feb. 10th) on Google Doc. (All)

5

Discussion topic: system-wide Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

Recommend items for systemwide MVP document

15 min

Framework for discussion: What processes would PSELG like to see added to the systemwide MVP document?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lL_Vh5vdqbak0SflPjtc0LLBO14eQ_eOsw74pzeIYq4/edit?usp=sharing

Add items to the MVP document even if similar to those questions in the PSELG OA Discovery document.

Add three items to MVP document. (Beth)

Potential wording:

  • Workflows for management of the CDI (Day One)

  • A structure for collaboration of all campus PRIMO VE Administrators (Day One)

  • A review and revision of shared cataloging practices for management of resources, including OA resources (6 months)

6

Wrap-up and next steps

Review actions and assignments

5 min

See Actions column.

7

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

Next Meeting: Monday, Feb. 22nd, 10-11am.

Future agenda items