...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Check-in / updates | Information sharing and problem-solving | 15 | All | TSELG: the group reviewed the revised GOBI proposal for systemwide contract for cataloging services (OCLC Plus). The proposal will be presented to Shared Content Leadership Group (SCLG) for approval. Marcive proposal will also be presented to SCLG this month. RMFG: reviewed our earlier decision pages to figure out what else needs to be tested/reviewed in test load. Still refining some collaborative workflow documents. Next week will be providing some feedback for Discovery and taking a look at how to handle Digitization workflow testing. | ||
2 | MVP | Share the experience using the MVP document Have any item on Systemwide Work sheet been moved to the MVP document? MVP lightening round is happening next week at SILS Chairs on Wednesday 2/10. Any questions? | 10 | Xiaoli | |||
3 | Test Load | What testing each group will do? Is it necessary to have a Testing Worksheet for PPC like the one we had for vanguard? When can we share the document Collaborative Workflow Testing and with whom (cohort and beyond)? Are there any documents and/or decision pages needed? Alma test environments potentially arriving on 2/12 moratorium is still until 2/25 | 30 | All | |||
4 | RMFG NZ roles document | Approve/decide how to route | Liz | RMFG identified these processes as needing a direct NZ login. CDL asked that the group outline frequency and suggested staff (CDL, campus, or both) to start a dialogue about what our options might be. Once PPC approves, how best to route this to CDL for further discussion? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MQPjVHIU-DYmY_suqSfAoGKSopF2LhSctB02LgmNpL8/edit?usp=sharing | |||
5 | What needs to be in OCLC? | Do we need to catalog everything in OCLC? Is OCLC record number still very important that we need to have it in IZ/NZ? | 15 | All |
|
|
|
6 | Proposal to form a Configurations Subgroup | Discuss whether we think a configurations subgroup is necessary, and if so, who should be members. | A few weeks ago at a SILS Chairs Mtg, someone suggested that there be a Configurations Subgroup. Discovery co-chairs met this week and agreed such a subgroup would be beneficial. Josephine drafted this proposal per the PM's request - PROPOSAL: Create a Configurations Subgroup DESIRED OUTCOME: Have one group make sure configurations are being done correctly and consistently WHY:
WHY NOW:
| ||||
7 | PM Update | Awareness of what’s happening / coming soon in the project | 5 | Christine |
| ||
78 | Homework | ||||||
89 | Parking Lot |
| |||||
910 | TOTAL | 75/90 |
Future agenda items
...