Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Jess Waggoner

Saved on

compared with

New Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Jess Waggoner

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

, 10am-11:00am

Attendees

  • Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley [Today’s Notetaker]

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine

  • Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced

  • Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles

  • Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside

  • Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]

  • Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library

  • Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara [Today’s Notetaker]

Not attending

  • Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair)

  • Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library

  • Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara

Discussion items

DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Updates from other SILS groups

Share relevant items

5 min

Jess

Sarah

PPC approved 2 decisions:

  • NZ Access: Access into the Network Zone (NZ) Alma instance will be determined on a case by case basis

  • Local bib data: Any data in the 5XX-7XX range that is local (that is not part of the OCLC master record) needs to be moved to a protected local field. In addition, Ex Libris recommends that institution-specific data be moved out of fields 900-949 and that only consortial data stay in those fields for the Network Zone. All campus-specific data in these fields needs to be relocated or deleted.

Discussion: Easy Active vs Fully Flexible

  • Will confirm with ExLibris that we truly have a choice

  • Which option does Discovery believe will provide the best user experience?

  • Jess will present about the discovery implications of the two options at the SILS Chairs mtg tomorrow (3/24)

2

CDI: Easy Active vs Fully Flexible

Provide Discovery FG perspective for Wednesday All Chairs meeting

20 min

Ellen & Jared (CDI Sub-group)

3

UC-eLinks

Discuss re-name and logo

15 min

Jess & Michael

Literature review and environmental scan complete

  • Any other data needed to help strengthen our case to change the label now?

  • Preliminary thoughts on new label language?

4

WorldCat

Check In - how are folks doing with WorldCat?

10 min

All

Relevant decision pages & docs:

  1. WorldCat Scope

  2. (Go Live) What to do with Basic WorldCat Discovery

  3. Pros/Cons: Worldcat.org vs Basic Discovery doc

5

Institution Boosting & Functionality Testing

Check In - how are folks doing with their institution boosting and functionality testing?

10 min

All

Relevant docs:

  1. Testing Plan folder

  2. Institution Boosting Testing doc

6

Next Meeting

Prep for next meeting

Plan to discuss a revised branding decision for Go Live

7

Parking Lot/Q&A

Save these issues for future discussion & comments

 

 

  • FRBR/Boosting

  • Main Menu (pull up config workbooks)

  • Facets

  • Libguides

  • Testing plan

  • Delivery and Fulfillment

  • Minimum Viable Product

  • WorldCat

  • Ebook ILL lending as it relates to discovery and limiting to availability.

  • UC-eLinks (re)naming

  • What will help links be called and where will they be in the interface?

Questions/comments:

  • SFX Journal Search Tool (moved notes to UC eLinks section)

  • Third party integrations

    • Browzine & LibKey

  • Ebook ILL lending: problematic with Melvyl; keep in mind to test in Test phase

...