...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Local group takeaways | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Updates (please add in advance) | 10 mins | Liz:
Hermine:
UCB: May or may not be of interest at this point: Someone in UCB RMFG created a Python tool “… to analyze two or more sets of records from different sources that match on OCLC number (i.e. they "should" be the same), and report on various discrepancies. So far the person has an "overall" comparison where you can see which source (e.g. UCLA vs Berkeley) has more records that have more fields, then list of side by side comparisons where you can compare the number of fields by 1xx, 2xx, 3xx, etc. You can also compare individual records side by side and they just built an option to pull the current OCLC record via z39.50 so you can see it alongside the records from your sets.” CMCKG (Sarah) CMCKG is beginning discussions about system-wide strategies for handling offensive subject headings such as Illegal aliens and the potential need for more nuanced subject access for selected materials than LCSH can provide. The group wants relevant SILS FGs to be aware of the discussions and is interested in any input on how this might look in the Alma/Primo system | |||||
| 2 | Decision pages | Bib records to leave out of the NZ (voting meeting 4/13) (voting-ish meeting 4/13) | ||||||
| 3 | Finalize MVP | Last pass at MVP doc (4/13) Push off new RLF deposits? | ||||||
| 4 | Decision pages for next week | Local authority files (voting meeting scheduled for 4/20) Should we wait on this? | ||||||
| 5 | Looking ahead | Metadata exports for HathiTrust and Google Books Digitization (4/27). UCB: Is this going to involve others? LIT currently does this and it interested in this discussion. Workflow schedule |
...