Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Not attending

Sarah Sheets UC Merced (WMS)

Discussion items

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Discussion

Actions

Announcements

Share short pieces of need-to-know information

5 min

All

Kate: SCP might be migrating significantly fewer bibs for Go-live than Test. Some packages not migrating: Naxos, Early American Imprints, etc. that will be turned on in CDI. Estimate is
1/3 less to 1/3 total of what was migrated for test.
Special Elsevier file will be distributed ~1,000 new titles

Catherine: Provided estimated counts for the existing Alma campus SCP/Marcive cleanup on Basecamp ticket for UCSB, UCI, UCR, UCD. Marcia will get counts for UCSC and add to Basecamp ticket.

Marcia Barrett Marcia will get counts for UCSC and add to Basecamp ticket.

RMFG and AEFG Decisions

https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/l/c/0AUSiAG2

15 min

All

Catherine: Document In the process of being approved; should be today(?)
TJ: standalone collection query
"Electronic portfolio , standalone = yes"
for future updating, best thing is to link to a CZ portfolio
Eileen: how does the AEFG CDL PO workflow investigation interact with the SCP-CDL PO bib migrating as suppressed>
Catherine/Erika: this decision would probably be for ongoing, not for migration, given the timing. So any cleanup would be post-go-live, not before.

Update on Day 1 post migration data cleanup document

Groups summarize/bring anything up that needs further discussion or clarification

20 min

All

https://docs.google.com/document/d/14pPaqCwoiQcdG2ZbimdjZQ8IdRhGmBz2YyHoviOUUeM/edit?usp=sharing

  • Breakouts!

  • Group 2 recommendations:

  • Technical migration – will be done/prioritized at the local level

  • Identifying corrupt characters

  • 1) ILSDC should have a normalization rule ready to go/share in the NZ that will do the updates that can be done in bulk (editing the double-daggers, etc)

  • 2) Existing Alma campuses should run the corrupt characters Indication rules on their test DB and production, in order to identify/flag any potential problems before that can be cleaned up in our existing systems now;

  • 3) we should be prepared to run either ONE indication rule and then split up (by campus?) or 10 indication rules (e.g. HAS 035 (cui) AND HAS [corrupt characters]). How this cleanup work will be divided remains to be determined

    Review document

    Use same breakout group framework as before. Work on these before our next meeting on 4/30 so we can discuss.

    • look at outstanding tasks (TJ has done this and assigned)

    • come up with DC strategy

    • test out recommendation for cleanup. Tests should be done by a different sub-group than the one that suggested the cleanup strategy.

    •