...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Check-in / updates | Information sharing and problem-solving | 5 | All | RMFG: working through MVP items, making good use of our study halls DCFG: Finalizing Decision Tree/Companion Document. AEFG: Worked to complete 003 on Import Profiles (see below). Continuing discussion on remaining MVP items, which involve CDL coordination. Fulfillment and ILL: DFG: Completed Filter by Availability (CDI) guidance document for campuses, campuses are determining how they will integrate Worldcat (local decision spreadsheet), wrapping up draft decision on MARC for facet/search/display in Primo - need to consult with RMFG as next step PSELG: no report ASCELG: | ||
| 2 | Decisions | Discuss and approve proposed decisions | 45 | Claudia |
| ||
| 3 | RMFG | Best practices documents | 15 | Liz M. | (Go-live and Beyond) Best practices for the OCLC Connexion Gateway Export Ok to keep as decision, link out to this from existing training hub doc (Go-live and Beyond) Best practices and guidance for MARCEdit/Alma integration in a Consortium Liz will contact internal training to get this moved into the training hub | ||
| 4 | MVP - Primo VE Configuration needing Collaborative Work, including Display Logic Rules | https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fz3hEoApCzWR9PvMRA2Yc2Bpq0hkBdvPaxRgfyz8WJA/edit#gid=0 From the Primo VE workshops: what areas need additional review/collaboration for configuration? Examples: Display Logic Rules, General Electronic Services, etc. that may need discussion across functional areas including e-resources management, fulfillment, CDL for NZ-level configuration. How should these collaborative areas in Discovery be addressed? What is currently on MVP to represent this, and if needing more, how should these items be represented (& with what ownership)? | 15 | Lisa | Lisa: it’s a big issue that impacts a lot of areas and might be good to do some messaging and start thinking about next steps. Do we need a subgroup? Are there minimums that need to be in place for Day 1? Jess: recent Primo trainings have surfaced some areas that weren’t on the radar before, some might be better candidates for post go-live. Agree that a subgroup is probably a good idea Next steps: AEFG already Alma campuses document their settings and identify critical ones, then reach out to Disco and CDL | ||
| 5 | EUOS (recurring) | https://docs.google.com/document/d/19pE99m3xZKp52BJVCBElm_d4bMPCpzRQt1-cW6gf_hQ/edit Soft deadline for when decisions that affect everyone can be completed | 10 | Claudia | Continued from last meeting: RMFG: June 8 DFG: June 8 Ongoing: make sure we keep the public service components in mind as we keep making decisions. PSELG is also going to keep monitoring discussions | To be shared with ICs and EUOS | |
| 6 | PM Update | Awareness of what’s happening / coming soon in the project | 0 | Christine | For Monday project updates and office hours, feel free to skip and watch the recording later if there are no topics or if topics are not a subject of interest. Meetings:
| ||
| 7 | Homework | ||||||
| 8 | Parking Lot | Future meeting:
| |||||
| 9 | TOTAL | 90/90 |
...