Legend:
Status | ||
---|---|---|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Page Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recommendation (updated 6/11/21, see action log)
Work in and access to the Network Zone (NZ) Alma instance will be determined on a case by case basis using the process outlined in this decision page.
...
As the UCs enter a new phase of a shared bibliographic collection in Alma, many needs and activities may shift from multiple campus ILSes into the Network Zone. These needs and activities may be complex and require a thoughtful transformation of UCs’ practices. As the soon-to-be ‘operational center’ of the SILS, including in particular the NZ Alma instance, CDL is committed to ensuring campus needs are met while maintaining integrity of the shared bibliographic collection.
...
Scope: Network Zone vs Network Zone Alma instance
We are careful in this document to differentiate between the “Network Zone” and the “Network Zone Alma instance.”
The “Network Zone” is a collaborative network of shared data in which all the UC Libraries participate;
The “Network Zone Alma instance” is the individual instance of Alma managed by CDL for the purposes of supporting CDL-managed UC collections in shared cataloging and shared acquisitions, for example.
It is possible for campus staff to do work “in the NZ” or affecting the NZ from their own IZ instance. For this, they use their same local campus Alma account. It is also known that some activities can only be done in the Network Zone Alma instance which requires a separate account.
The scope of this document covers only work done within the Network Zone Alma instance. Work done in the Network Zone at-large is coordinated and governed by the appropriate SILS teams, and documented in other decision pages.
Decision-making process for “Network Zone Deputy Account”
As you identify an activity that must be performed in the NZ Alma instance for the test load and/or for ongoing work (go-live and beyond), consult with the relevant FG or your campus Implementation Coordinator to understand and detail the use case(s) and workflow(s).
Inform NZ Administrators (NZ Admins), Alison Ray and Gem Stone-Logan via sils-sysops@cdlib.org when new activities are identified.
NZ Admins, in consultation with the appropriate SILS teams and others, begin the analysis process for newly-identified activities to understand the available options for doing this work: e.g. does it really need to be done from the NZ Alma instance, how often does it need to be done, what is the most efficient way to do it, etc..
On a case-by-case basis, NZ Admins determine whether NZ Alma instance access is needed or whether the use case can be satisfied by other means, such as an automated process or by dedicated NZ staff.
NZ Admins record the decision and communicate with relevant SILS teams and the original stakeholder.
Workflow-creation process
Once a decision about how to do the work and whether an NZ Alma account will be granted is made, NZ Admins will collaborate with the appropriate SILS team and the original stakeholder on defining the work and assigning the account.
A person assigned an NZ Alma account will be a “Network Zone Deputy” and will perform the work on behalf of all UCs system-wide. Given the limitations on NZ Alma instance account numbers, and to maximize efficiencies, an NZ Deputy may do work for multiple similar use cases.
The NZ Deputy will be given a clear definition of the work, timetable, deliverables, etc.
The NZ Admins will be given a timetable for the use of the account (see below for rotating membership accounts).
A SILS team will be designated as the “home” of this particular activity and point of contact for questions, reviewing the work, troubleshooting, etc.
Dependencies + Context
Within the CDL as operational center, the Network Zone Administrators act as stewards of the Network Zone, monitoring performance and growth; performing maintenance; and administrating access, among other things. They do this in the context of the SILS governance, working in conjunction with the SILS Service Manager and the SILS teams.
NZ Alma accounts:
Accounts will be granted on the basis of the necessary work (as documented in the use cases) not on a campus representative basis.
Accounts may be granted on a rotating basis if NZ Deputy work rotates among a SILS team.
Many campus-specific tasks involving the Network Zone can be done from within that campus’ IZ; for access to the NZ Alma instance, priority will be given to work being on behalf of all UCs system-wide.
Because the NZ Alma instance can only support a few number of accounts, priority will be given to accounts which do multiple tasks.
The NZ has a limited number of accounts (still to be determined but likely less than 30, including all CDL staff managing work in the NZ). The NZ Deputy account would be in addition to a campus IZ account for a single person. It would count as two accounts toward the UC’s total number of purchased Alma accounts. (verified by ExL via basecamp 3/25/2021).
Approach + Timeline
Until the extent and nature of NZ work is better understood, the NZ Admins and CDL staff will perform work in the network zone as needed through test load and for “Day One.”
As use cases are identified leading up to and after Go-Live, ongoing work will be reviewed and assigned to Network Zone Deputies as needed.
Currently identified use cases:
RMFG NZ processes and roles table
...
It was not necessary to create an NZ account for ILSDC in this case.
Decided use cases:
(Test load/Go-live) Requesting the creation of NZ Normalization Processes from CDL
...
Action/Point Person | Expected Completion Date | Notes | Status | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Create a decision page to outline the decision-making process and to gather use cases Alison Ray (CDL) and Lena Zentall (Unlicensed) |
|
| |||||||
Get feedback and approval on the decision making process from PPC | and | Lena Zentall (Unlicensed) to ask PPC to put on the meeting agenda. |
| ||||||
Get feedback from the PPC members who were absent at the March 19 meeting Xiaoli Li |
|
| |||||||
Share the final, approved decision page with ICs, all-cohort |
| Gem Stone-Logan will share on ICs, all-cohort, SILS Chairs |
| ||||||
Determine if use cases should continue to be gathered (as links) in this decision page or if another format would make more sense, e.g., table, sheet, etc. | Yes, put use cases in this decision page. | ongoing | |||||||
Added ‘decided use cases’ section; added one decided use case in that section; updated contact point for NZ administrators | 6/7/21 | AMR | done | ||||||
Updated page language: title, recommendation, scope, workflow-creation process, context, etcapproach and timeline. | 6/9/21 | CN | awaiting review and approval (re)approved by PPC ( 6/11)/21 |