Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Michelle Polchow

Saved on

compared with

New Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Sherry Lochhaas

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Sherry Lochhaas

  • Michelle Polchow, provisional chair

  • Jharina Pascual

  • Kevin Balster (absent)

  • Sarah Sheets

  • Carla Arbagey

  • Judy Keys

  • Katie Keyser

  • Natalee Bell 

  • Tamara Pilko

  • Lisa Mackinder

...

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Chair/Vice Chair

Decision by February 10, 2022

5 min

Michelle Polchow

move to put candidates to vote

Michelle Polchow - Chair
Tamara Pilko - Vice Chair

Report to SOT

2

Report on CDL Vendor/License/Acquisitions framework in support of local members processing new NZ acquisitions

Update subteam

1 min

Michelle Polchow

3

Team Charter

  • Start writing objective

  • propose initially rotating roles

15 min

Michelle Polchow

Team Charter Document (Confluence)

Sherry - Notes
Jharina -Time Keeper

Sarah - Action Items

4

Multi-Series E-Collections

Introduce problem statement

20 min

Lisa MacKinder

Documents:
CDL proposals for handling electronic resources with “multi-part” collections

Three proposed CDL models

  • Discussion leaned toward allowing CDL to determine this on a case-by-case basis, with feedback from Discovery as needed. Importance was stressed for allowing CDL/SCP to manage their workflows efficiently.

  • Questions: Who determines what is the best user experience? If CDL solicited voting among campuses, how would a final determination be made? Campuses may consider local activations if an NZ activation doesn’t meet their needs. How might this affect a Primo database list (and how many campuses use this feature?)

Potential options:

  • motion for further discussion

  • motion to ask SOT to have Discovery Subteam review

  • other?

Lisa Mackinder
continue brainstorming how to parse response to case by case handling of collection level records if no consensus by campuses. (Role for Discovery feedback?)

5

Impact Statement on Electronic Resources Management - December 2021
From AEFG

Introduce problem statement and recommendations from AEFG

20 min

Carla

Documents:
Impact Statement on Electronic Resources Management - December 2021

E-Resources Workflow Legacy v. Alma

  • Members are asked to review the Impact Statement & workflow documents & consider ideas for new workflows UC-wide or at their campuses

Lisa Mackinder
look into possibility of biweekly CDL meetings on eresources.

6

Wrap Up

Review actions and decisions

5

7

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

8

Total

x/x

...