...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharing and Updates | Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups | 5 | All | |||||
| 2 | Update: Single OCLC symbol for consortia e-content. | Identify if the new information creates new concerns. | all | This is in regards to using SCPER for all consortia e-content, not for using a single symbol for regular holdings.RM was asked: How would information be identified and limited by material available for a specific campus? RM’s response.The ability to distinguish different campuses would not be possible within OCLC products for these records if they were set to a single symbol. The catalog links are taken from whatever is in the WC registry: http://www.worldcat.org/webservices/registry/xsl/search-advanced (I’m not sure who was tasked with updating the registry for the *er symbols, but I suspect it was me and I didn’t do it). Each symbol can have only ONE catalog link.The CDLER symbol does not currently have any online catalog at all (http://www.worldcat.org/webservices/registry/Institutions/132451 ), meaning that (right now), no link to a campus would be provided. (I would guess the decision about what the link would be, if any, would fall to Discovery OST, should this decision go forward). | (As this is only related to consortia e-content, not to individual campus content, does anyone think there would be any Discovery concerns?) |
| |||
| 3 | Revisit: Shared Code Repository | Mobile usability issues | |||||||
| 4 | Review: excluding CDI ebooks | Identify pros/cons of including/excluding CDI eBooks from default Articles, books, and more. | all | Discussion Page: Exclude eBooks from CDI Results UCI Testing View for excluding CDI eBooks Questions to consider:
| |||||
| 5 | Review: How do the campuses utilize 930/973 fields? | Discussion Page: Discovery Impact: 930/973 fields - Practice for Continued Use
930/973 fields- practice for continued use Description: These fields are used by CDL and campuses to pull together e-resource packages. There is a need to evaluate how effective these are and whether Alma has a better alternative, including relying on on e-resource Collection Names instead. | |||||||
| 6 | The Digital Collections Project Team is seeking Discovery's feedback on a project they inherited from phase 4.The "Digital Collections Decision Tree" is a tool to help campuses decide if they want to share their digital collections (typically archival, if I understood right) in UC Library Search and, if so, how to best represent those collections.They're looking for our initial "hot take" on this tree and the documentation, as well as any questions or concerns we may have.Further, they would like us to think about how to frame informative documentation to make the decision tree "mean something." For example, answering the question of WHY (and why not) a campus might want to share their digital collections in the first place, WHY they might not want to share the entire collection, etc.Below are some documents that they sent me. Try and give them a look and we can start discussions on Friday.Digital Collections Project Team Overview: https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DCPT/overview | 6 | Review: Digital Collections Decision Tree | Discussion Page: Digital Collections Decision Tree | |||||
| 7 | Standing Item: Review Issues Spreadsheet and Parking Lot. | Issue tracking decision still pending (Shared code repository may be involved) | |||||||
| 8 | Wrap up | Review actions and decisions | 5 | ||||||
| 9 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion: | |||||||
| 10 | Total | 45 |
...