...
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sharing and Updates | Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups | 5 | All | |||
2 | Update: Single OCLC symbol for consortia e-content. | Identify if the new information creates new concerns or if we’ll continue to wait for ILL’s decision. | all | This is in regards to using SCPER for all consortia e-content, not for using a single symbol for regular holdings.
|
| ||
3 | Revisit: Shared Code Repository | Mobile usability issues Shared Repository Proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IEdjMzrhoLfOl6a5AmUCevhZywXuiM31jebHhJJ91Hs/edit#heading=h.36u2v11b1agr | Team approved GitHub proposal. Gem is sending it up the ladder. Joshua, Sean, and Michael will meet to discuss how to best handle reviewing source code. | ||||
4 | Review: excluding CDI ebooks | Identify pros/cons of including/excluding CDI eBooks from default Articles, books, and more. | all | Discussion Page: Exclude eBooks from CDI Results UCI Testing View for excluding CDI eBooks Questions to consider:
| Team has not had ample opportunity for testing. We will revisit this issue when we’ve had time to do actual testing. |
| |
5 | Review: How do the campuses utilize 930/973 fields? | Discussion Page: Discovery Impact: 930/973 fields - Practice for Continued Use
| It doesn’t seem like any campus uses the 973 locally to track e-collections anymore, but they do use it for legacy information. |
| |||
6 | Review: Digital Collections Decision Tree | Discussion Page: Digital Collections Decision Tree |
| ||||
7 | Standing Item: Review Issues Spreadsheet and Parking Lot. | Issue tracking decision still pending (Shared code repository may be involved) | |||||
8 | Wrap up | Review actions and decisions | 5 | ||||
9 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion: | |||||
10 | Total | 45 |
...