...
Criterion | Value |
|---|---|
Define FRBR display for local records | Preferred |
Enable FRBR | Yes |
Enable Dedup | No |
Criteria for FRBR preferred record | Type = Availability |
Alma-P (Preferred record is Print) | Alma-D (Preferred record is Digital) | Alma-E (Preferred record is electronic) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
ShakespeareBurgess, Anthony, 1917-1993. https://ucr-psb.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CDL_RIV_INST/cvsnv/alma991013691159704706 |  |  | ||
Print Only | ShakespeareEgan, Gabriel. OCN: https://ucr-psb.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CDL_RIV_INST/nqi7j/alma991032960883104706 | FRBR Only Brief result  FRBR Only Group (same for all)  | FRBR Only Brief result  | FRBR Only Brief result |
Electronic Only | ShakespeareHerder, Johann Gottfried, 1744-1803. | Brief Result:  FRBR Only Group (same for all)  | Brief Result:  | Brief Result: |
Both Print and Electronic | I noticed an issue in Alma where I couldn’t add Criteria: Availability right off the bat. I’d have to add Date or Resource first, then the Availability option showed in the drop down. It was weird. I also had to “Add and Close” instead of just “Add.” It might be a one-off issue for me though. | Brief Result:  FRBR Only Group (same for all)  | Brief Result:  | Brief Result:  Why is the preferred record for print/electronic displaying as print? |
Thoughts | The availability is whichever record was used by Primo to make the “representation” in the brief results. Unsure why the chosen record is 4th in the group though. | The sorting of FRBRized records is a known issue with Ex Libris with multiple tickets open. It’s being worked on. | I’m uncertain why Alma-D and E had the same results. I’m also not sure why the print is the preferred record when the electronic one is still right there. My settings appear to be correct… |