Page Comparison

Review the charge

Develop a shared understanding of the roles, responsibilities, principles, etc.

• What is the extent to which we can/should recommend changes to workflows? Affirmed: not for this group to determine that we should change workflows; in part, we’re validating (this is what we’re doing; establishing agreement around our data definitions; some actions are out of scope)

• In the charge, the data reporting requirements are prioritized in the charge; core goal for 22/23 reporting is to establish a plan/path for UCOP stats reporting and then seek to address the other reporting needs

• Recognition (from CoUL, DOC) that annual statistics presently take too much time

• Affirmation: this charge is scoped to data in the SILS/Alma (non-SILS data is out of scope)

• This team should consider how we define each data requirement (e.g., proposing that we count the item record and not hand counting)

• Regarding keeping SILS LG in the loop: We don’t want surprises; regular check-in’s and the project team should readily update

CDL Op Center setting up tools 

Update

• Gem will email the group to affirm everyone has Slack and wiki access.

• Lynne will connect with Caitlin, to confirm Google access for project team members.

Determining chair, vice chair? co-chair?

• The Chair schedules, helps sets agendas and facilitates meetings.

• Ellen will serve as Chair, with Chan and Michele joining her in a steering committee.

• Ellen will circulate a doodle poll for scheduling.

Meeting schedule

• How often do we need to meet? It is an aggressive timeline.

• Weekly meetings (at least to start; if we split to subgroups, could change the frequency). Aim to have a standing meeting.

Wrap up

Review actions and decisions

5

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

Total

x/x