...
| Page Properties |
|---|
Status | | Status |
|---|
| colour | Yellow |
|---|
| title | IN PROGRESS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Description | Investigate how limit by availability is impacting UX; also assess/consider ILL impact |
|---|
Decision summary | |
|---|
Owning group | DISC |
|---|
Approver | Final decider; group with the authority to approve the decision. Unless multiple groups are affected or additional staffing or finances are required, your group can approve its own decisions. |
|---|
Consulted | eResources, Fulfillment |
|---|
Informed | Groups/individuals who need to know about this decision. For broad-reaching decisions, SILS has a cohort-wide email list (SILS-Cohort-L@ucop.edu) and slack channel for all SILS members #all-cohort. SILS News email list reaches ~500 self-subscribed UC staff (SILS-News-L@ucop.edu) |
|---|
Decision-making process | Describe the process your group will use to make the decision. |
|---|
Priority | High |
|---|
Target decision date | [type // to add Date] The date your group aims to make the decision. Allow time for consulting. |
|---|
Date decided | [type // to add Date] You must add a date field for it to sort properly. It will not sort if you simply type the date. The date the Approver approves the decision. |
|---|
|
Recommendation
(Harmonization undesirable. Each campus should make the decision based upon their collection and user needs).
Impact
Stakeholder group | Impact |
|---|
Who does this decision affect? [name of the group] | Explain the significance of the decision to EACH stakeholder group. How will this decision impact this particular group? What will change? Do they need to take any action? If so, when? |
ILL | |
eResources | |
Reasoning
Background
Prior to the migration to a consortium, campuses were able to curate their CDI collections. While this required them to turn on access to individual collections, it also allowed them to weed out collections with poor metadata.
...