Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees (Survey Analysis Subgroup)

...

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

START RECORDING

Survey reponses & reports folder

@Marcia Barrett

2

Summaries of Survey Responses

Supporting documentation:

@Marcia Barrett

Categorize responses:

  • Active discussions, metadata remediation and prioritization, issues observed (columns BB-BE)

  • Non-LC vocabularies and Non-English metadata used (columns BG-BK)

  • Policies and mechanisms for:

    • handling problematic metadata

    • display of problematic metadata in discovery

    • users to report problematic metadata (columns BN-BU)

  • Needs that could be addressed at the system-wide level, role of a UC-wide body, and other thoughts (columns CC-CE)

Some campuses seem to be waiting for system-wide recommendations rather than implementing practices such as using non-LC vocabularies

Agreement on content

Completed draft we can share with EIMPT

@Marcia Barrett

3

Local Projects

Decision on how to present this data

@Marcia Barrett

Summarize categories of projects – classification, etc.

Appendix - title & description of project, consider adding outcome

Israel Yáñez create a draft

4

Other information

Identify other information needed

Marcia Barrett Israel Yáñez Catherine Busselen Claudia Conrad Naomi Shiraishi Start thinking about what else we want to know (topics for focus groups)

5

Summary of survey responses

Identify content to be included in summary

Marcia Barrett Catherine Busselen Naomi Shiraishi

Israel Yáñez Claudia Conrad

Think about strong themes from survey responses to include in the summaryExecutive Summary

6

Total

60 min