| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
|---|
| 1 | (STANDING ITEM) Subteam Roundup | Check-in on OSTs - capture any shared issues or cross-team task | 5 | Team | RM - finishing up ETD documentation and implementing “new” and “merged” records to the WorldCat Update workflow, working on running the Identifying Brief Level job across the whole NZ. ERES - OED authentication not working, more problematic for some campuses; CRL collections need updating by ExL in CDI (stalled - will ask for this to be on next Support mtg agenda) → send to Gem and we’ll bring to meeting on Friday. | | |
| 2 | Questions from Slack | FYI on anything quick that came up | 5 | Team | Do we want to schedule a “Decision page” review discussion? → invite all “chair” type people. Not right now. When to choose a decision page vs a policy page? Decision page is comparing between two or more options and vote. This was more common during implementation. Now we are working more on living documents--ok to not stick with the strict decision/policy page binary.
Brainstorm session: how to make the enhancement process better?
| | When do we want to have an “advocacy” session in ACH |
| 3 | OT / LG updates | | 5 | Jackie | Chair engagement: some groups are having trouble rounding up Vice Chairs, and the structure of governance questions are bubbling up. LG cancelled 9/1 meeting (early holiday release) - so meeting this week (no update) OT: CJK lessons learned convo which was very helpful.
| | |
| 4 | Signature Success Program | Discussion and next steps for how to work strategically with Ex Libris | 15 | CaitlinDrop “beeves” from Slack into here | Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-xayW3AtXd7EjylhM6ty3w9qbEigDsJFZINBFUnKPUs/edit Are there any topics that are things that came from the RFP? Are we prioritizing workflow efficiency or patron experience? Lack of functionality between IZ/NZ Lack of documentation RM: talking about how the system works but that doesn’t work for us. We’re looking for things that are intrinsic to the design. → a lot of that stems from focusing on an IZ setup. Can we divide these beeves into “doable by ExLibiris” and “really more in our camp” What is the efficiency that we gain from having the NZ/IZ setup? We associate strategic thinking and RFP/RFQ with “profound disappointment” - the market is so central to these questions. It’s our job to let Ex Libris know our minds!
| Let’s continue work on this next time! | - Caitlin Nelson clean up the Google Doc with an eye to sharing with OT/LG next time.
|
| 5 | How do we want to move forward? | Have a plan for these meetings going forward that fit with the outcomes the team wants | 5 | Team | Team Charter: will review next time. | | |
| 6 | STANDING - Work Plan Directory review | | 5 | Team | | | |
| 7 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | | | | | |
| 8 | | Total | /60 | | | | |