Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Item

Discussion Points

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Assemble

  • Notetaker assignment

  • Record meeting

  • Salwa Ismail will be attending in Chan’s place

Notetaker: Ellen Augustiniak

5

All



2

Walkthrough of draft review files

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bzidSrnJICyLQlocxbbTz4XYTgwsW1iGyBnEBZZVFhQ/edit?gid=1524452553#gid=1524452553&range=A1:A2

30

Daisy

3

"Special" library category designation

Question from UCB - how is this designation determined?

General question: Do we still need to delineate stats from the NZ by special collections locations (SCA) and non-SCA locations? This was part of the original prototype; it is not used in UCL/UCOP annual stats. With AASA-PT’s original report, our recommendation was that special collections stats should not be generated from the NZ (this was endorsed by CoUL). If a few campuses do use this data - should we provide it to them separately, as opposed to part of this process (that way, everybody doesn’t need to confirm SCA locations each year - reduce workload)?

10

All

4

Should we remove the “electronic” and “physical” designation from the resource type labels? (if time)

Sample output of what this would look like:

image (2).png

10

All

5

Wrap up

Review actions and decisions

5

6

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

7

Total

60/60

...