| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Ex Libris support | | 5 0 min | Team | | | |
2 | All Chairs meeting update | | 9:05 - 9:08 mins1 minute | Sarah | | | |
3 | Ex Libris “bug blitz” | Decide how to advise Gem for tomorrow’s meeting | 5min0 min | Caitlin | Background: “There's an ELUNA/IGeLU Steering Committee/Coordinators meeting scheduled for Thursday. I'm looking at the agenda and it looks like we (?) will be voting an Ex Libris' plans for fixing 'normal' priority defects (I assume normal means in terms of severity, but I'm not sure). Option 1 is to keep developing as planned and more than 75% of normal bugs will get solved within 12 months. Option 2 is a "bug blitz" where more than 75% of normal bugs will get solved within 6 months. (I am checking to see if the CCoP Steering committee liaison has more info.)This is coming straight from the agenda, I have no more information at the moment. However, do you think UC has a preference? With no other information, I'd choose fixing bugs because buggy software constantly impedes staff efficiencies. However, I am very biased when it comes to this sort of thing. What do you all think?” Decision to discuss this asynchronously?
| | |
4 | Negotiations Team Briefing | | 5 0 mins | Caitlin | | | |
5 | OT Workplan | | 9:08 - 9:47 mins | Sarah | 54 minutes | Sarah | Document for discussion: New OT Workplan Discussion with Lakshmi regarding the OT Workplan design and purpose of the plan importance of OST check-ins and monitoring their workplans what would we like to see as SILS moves into a new phase in this 4th year of our contract, it’s time to critically evaluate Alma to advise LG (may potentially consider another RFP) Caitlin will create a proposal of our new plan/ideas - run it by SILS OT SC first and then SILS OT
Document for discussion: New OT Workplan Future API requests Shared Governance Task Force Ongoing, UCLAS-integrated SILS structure, work practices and charges plan a lengthy discussion of representation?(advocacy/leadership/experts vs. comprehensive campus representation) at a future SILS OT meeting background: related to the question regarding term limits other questions to guide this discussion: if the work changed by having only experts on a team, how would it change? how could non-expert representatives be used in other collective areas?
| | - Caitlin Nelson to present the idea to AC of making this the year of assessment for our OSTs (idea of taking action “for the patron”)
- Caitlin Nelson to create a proposal of our new plan/ideas for OSTs to present asynchronously first to SILS OT SC and later to SILS OT
|
6 | Known Issues | | 10 0 mins | Team | | | |
7 | Executive Session | | 5 0 mins | Team | | | |
8 | Build agenda for next OT meeting | | 5 minminutes | Team | | | |
9 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | 5 0 mins | Team | | | |
10 | | Total | 45 mins 60 minutes | | | | |