Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Zoom URL: https://berkeley.zoom.us/j/99437694899?pwd=9nX1Pd82i2VWzoHcIjPs3mPf2nreSn.1

Topic / Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

make sure Kristen records meeting / any announcements?

1

Kristen

Any announcements?

FY24 stats due 12/6 - Primo changes have fixed discrepancies at UCB & UCR

VDX-VDX Billing Subgroup. Documenting outstanding VDX requests. Please try and have practices filled out by Dec 13th and full sheet filled out by Jan 31st.

2

Moving Berkeley to “UC Northern Universities” in Rota

10

Kristen

Confirming time, dates, and commitment. Kristen sent out an email: current proposal is to push changes out on the 9th.

3

P2P Testing Conclusions; wrap up “testing phase” of https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/RS/pages/2669903874/Extend+Alma+Resource+Sharing+with+UC+P2P#Testing-in-all-UC-SBs%3A

25

Kristen

Wrap up discussion. We’ve all been testing P2P for a while now: do we feel like it meets our needs as well or better than the AFN currently does?

UCR group testing was successful; disliked how hands-on workflow was

UCD group felt successful - worried about workflow complications; liked better analytics & manage-able, disliked how hands-on workflow was

UCSF: workflow impacts external depts at UCSF (access services), for paging & filling reqs; UCR feedback - pick from shelf not auto (have to move reqs to pfs for phys items, in lending workflow)

UCSB: configuration hurdles prohibited full testing

UCB/UCSC group: configuration hurdles as well, unable to test workflow fully; lending workflow creates big changes & lots manual workload - inhibits buyin, severely delays nrlf (and srlf) reqs at least a day (ucr suggestion: no rlf p2ps only afn - should send this question to ExL)

UCB/NRLF: forces NRLF to become RS library, meaning that patrons have to be assigned to UCB RS Library - changes patron load & existing patrons

CDL expresses concerns about cooccurrence of Tipasa implementation during proposed timeline

UCSC proposes to table & revisit after tipasa implementation

temp check to golive in jan 2025: mostly 1s and 2s, two 4s

  • decision to table & revisit after tipasa implementationSep 202: 4s & 5s
  •  Kristen Van Vliet send update to stakeholders about decision to table until Sep 2025
4

Workstream Improvement Project comments and feedback

5

Kristen

Workstream Improvement Plan.

Quick update from Kristen & Dawson

attempted clarification between public roadmap & WIP: ExL indicates that UC should give their priority within WIP regardless of ExL’s placement on public roadmap

5

Wrap up & action points

5

12/11/24: with OCLC, Tipasa Implementation Project plan (draft plan)

6

Active Project Updates / Next steps and discussion times

5

Kristen

Non-Alma billing group working with Fulfillment OST. UCR, UCB, UCSC, mbe UCM. First meeting Nov 4th.

list of AFN reports - TBD/subgroup working

Tentative Dec 11 2024; Tipasa - OCLC guest spot to discuss Draft_UC_Tipasa_Implementation_Plan_September2024-1

schedule c reports - reminder check Sept for June 2024 fallout requests

P2P project - testing in sandbox. Wrap up discussion on Dec 4th

RLF lib use only / bookband pilot - January 2025 ish

7

(bike rack) Capture important topics for future discussion

Do we want to keep physical P2P requesting turned on?

8

Total

x/x

...