Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Peter Brantley

  • Felicia Poe

  • Alison Regan

Agenda and draft discussion notes 🗒

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Housekeeping

Opportunity for co-chairs and members to share brief announcements and notices.

00:05

Ginny

  • N/A

 

 

2

SGTF mid-phase assessment

SGTF members should review the draft survey and consider the following questions in advance of the call:

  • Do these questions meet the goals we set for the assessment?

  • Are any questions confusing?

  • Are any questions unnecessary?

  • Are we missing any questions?

On Friday’s call, the task force will determine if edits/changes are required or whether we can proceed with building the survey.

00:35

Alan, Kevin, Sarah

  • Many thanks to Alan, Kevin and Sarah for drafting the initial survey!

  • When you look at the resulting data, we’ll need to be able to discern what feedback is specific to local governance and systemwide.

  • Additional feedback was inserted directly into the draft survey.

  • Action: The subgroup will review the feedback and make additional changes to the survey based on today’s conversation.

  • Action: Danielle will confirm the survey tool available at CDL; she’ll check-in with the subgroup to see if it meets our needs.

3

Integrating SILS into UCLAS

Re-review the current UCLAS, DOC’s role and the kind of governance groups that report to DOC (leadership group, strategy team).

Proposal: form a subgroup to further consider and develop how, structurally, SILS governance and operations can be integrated into UCLAS.

00:10

Ginny

  • Action: Sarah T., Felicia and Salwa will form a subgroup. Danielle will provide staff support.

4

 

Total

00:50

 

 

 

 

...