Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

, 10am-11:30am

Attendees

  • Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine

  • Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced

  • Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles

  • Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside [Today’s Notetaker]

  • Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego

  • Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair)

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]

  • Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library

  • Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara

Not attending

Discussion items

DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.

Configurations are generally set for freeze date

Dedup options: None= ExL blackbox method for choosing record w/ most metadata

Updated Campus’ configs to include dedup availability/criteria selections

Are there unresolved issues re SCP records? Ghost records?

  • will be on NZ for go-live; see RMFG in decision pages

  • more documentation desired about how this will work and get tested

  • clarity around obtaining analytics/stats

  • 793 field includes collection name in UCSD SC and also package name for SCP

  • CDL records not discoverable in Alma IZ but are in Primo IZ (“made available for”)

FRBR suppression rules

  • being worked on

  • after created each campus is responsible for local rules

Unsure how future work will be completed

  • SILS transition team will address

Meetings between freeze and when instances are returned:

  • JT will check in on Tues morn to see if a meeting is useful

6

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Basic WorldCat Discovery Discussion

Final comments for now

20 Check Ins

Discuss updates/problems/testing

30 min

All

(Go Live) What to do with Basic WorldCat Discovery

Discussion notes https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jKQE6gm5UUd9-NK_LYAdnU3uL_518lyW4S8jAC43J-U/edit?usp=sharing

Provide Alison Ray with a list of resources to link to within Basic WorldCat Discovery (found in footer and resources drop-down; will be harmonized across campuses)

Request to have links open in new windows

Links (in order)

  • UC Library Search

  • Connect from Off Campus

  • Library Website [Campus provided name]

  • Help

Include chat widget info on spreadsheet

Note: current instances of WCB are not uniform due to CDL testing

  • JW making spreadsheet to send out

  • Populate spreadsheet with preferred campus url’s for each resource link

  • Include chat widget info on spreadsheet

  • JW ask Alison Ray re: page listing all campus Primo instances

2

Sharing our knowledge

Brainstorm items we can contribute to Internal Training Subgroup

20 min

All

Anything we want to add to https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/l/c/R0JaesBm (linkable from SILS project Confluence page)

Anything we would like to add?

  • Campus select configurations Google sheet

Anyone creating a front facing (staff? patrons?) for UCLS?

  • JT offer ITS FAQs and configuration sheet to be added to Training Doc Hub or at a higher level

3

Campus Select Configurations Sheet

Review sheet

20 min

All

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d5VMs3tBOi2IIfAXjHRmkEwZUG8iQxf536iQM2II8nc/edit?usp=sharing

If still being decided- update Campus’ configs to include dedup availability/criteria selection

4

Check Ins

Discuss updates/problems/testing

30 min

All

SH can pass feedback back to RMFG chairs

  • JT will check in on Tues morn to see if a meeting is useful

5

Next Meeting

Prep for next meeting

  • 899 Field? 520 Field? to exclude materials from NZ using custom filter built by ExLibris. Requires campuses to use this specific NZ filter custom scope Search Profiles.
    Will need to look at Post-GoLive.

  • DFG be together through December 2021; what work will be done is TBD.

  • UCSF - e.g., of Risk Assessment - More books appeared because many were DDA and should have been removed.

  • UCSC/UCD configuration screenshots

  • How quickly did already Alma/Primo campus start making changes/tweaks? Within weeks of GoLive. Needed to determine where it was breaking? Data, Link Resolver, SCP, etc.

  • UCI - Test Load needed to be reloaded in 2018; contingency planning worked as designed.

  • How much EZ-Active will ultimately effect experience. CDI and EZ-Active is still unknown until we see what is happening. e.g, sometimes searching for known items can result in duplicate records especially for ebooks.

  • How much initial feedback, questions, concerns at initial rollout?

  • RLF is on-hold and will be Post GoLive.

  • Still questions about SCP, Jared Campbell is keeping his eyes and ears open for any more news and will shared when more is known. SCP is part of many different Functional Groups.

  • UCSC - Based on usability testing, users were confused about Request and how long it takes to fulfill requests. Custom code to provide custom messaging books vs articles. Temporary removed message for books.

  • Users still need to have their barcodes “activated” in their library accounts even though they no longer need to use them to login and make ILL Requests.

  • Course Reserves - ebooks not showing up in

  • Voting for enhancements; perhaps poll our votes across UC instead of by individual campuses especially for consortial related items.

  • TIP: any customizations will need to be checked everytime there are updates/releases monthly. Alma and Primo have separate release notes.

  • Discussion of features such as QR codes; Automatically appeared for brief results; need to be turned on in individual full records.

  • Testing - different strategies: general pain points or strategic customization such as labels, links, etc.

  • Different strategies on collecting feedback from end users as well as internal users. UCB one specific group to work with are language librarians.

  • UCSC also utilizes a more heuristic approach as well to identify and receive feedback.

  • Refer to UCSC usability reports for after you collect your data. Reports in Google Drive.

  • Internal training, what are campuses doing?

  • Development of FAQs?

2

Next Meeting

Prep for next meeting

Check-in on Monday if we need to meet and will continue with discussions as needed.

3

Parking Lot/Q&A

Save these issues for future discussion & comments

 

 

  • Libguides

  • Testing plan

  • Ebook ILL lending as it relates to discovery and limiting to availability.

Questions/comments:

...