Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Sherry Lochhaas

  • Michelle Polchow, provisional chair

  • Jharina Pascual

  • Kevin Balster

  • Sarah Sheets

  • Carla Arbagey

  • Judy Keys

  • Katie Keyser

  • Natalee Bell 

  • Tamara Pilko

  • Lisa Mackinder

...

Not in attendance:

  • Kevin Balster (absent)

Meeting documents:
Slide Deck for Meeting

Priority:
CDL Licenses/Vendors:
--360 renewal/need for resources
--CDL recharge - infrastructure to UCSD (Oracle)
--Barrier to progress is technology compatibility, human resources,
--discovery affected by excess IZ inventory which seems universal work-around.

CDL needing acquisition support
--multi-part collections/ JSTOR
--payment vs discovery
-- document that has not received consensus

Specific product problems (communication/workflow):
--what are our new resources / what do we have retrospectively (access/troubleshooting)
-- help Adrianna in identifying CZ collections
--Factiva
--Linking IZ to NZ
--Some CZ records from Alma campuses became NZ records
Alma SUSHI server -
--transition from CDL usage technology
--policy/workflow problem with Alma embedded in Acquisitions/ permissions issue
--Phase 4- Outbound linking group has potential to transition into SUSHI set-up group
Publishing OCLC holdings for e-resources
--how other campus decisions impact other libraries
-- Loading of records (IZ/NZ)
--wipe out NZ records
--ILL / licenses for e-booksMichelle Polchow to send out Ex Libris documentation for how consortia members
Michelle Polchow &

Lisa Mackinder
work on problem statement addressing with resource issues faced by CDL (360 renewal, Oracle, log-jam for 10 campuses, human resources shortage)

Michelle Polchow to send out full Phase 4 List email
Michelle Polchow Share Acq meeting time with group

Lisa Mackinder - share doc in Google Drive for multi-part collections (no decision yet)

5

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Chair/Vice Chair

Decision by February 10, 2022

5 minutesmin

Michelle Polchow report to SOT

move to future meeting

2

Meet weekly/biweekly

Balance consortia, campus & potential subcommittee/joint Acquisitions work

10 minutes

February 17, reconsider frequency but keep meeting weekly until then.

3

Priority Issues

Temperature reading for prioritizing group’s focus:
--Work plan
--Training resources
--Awaiting SILS Phase 4 assignments

10 minutes

4

Team Charter

Begin working on the charter

20 minutes

Michelle Polchow make this first on agenda for 1/27/2022

move to put candidates to vote

Michelle Polchow - Chair
Tamara Pilko - Vice Chair

Report to SOT

2

Report on CDL Vendor/License/Acquisitions framework in support of local members processing new NZ acquisitions

Update subteam

1 min

Michelle Polchow

3

Team Charter

  • Start writing objective

  • propose initially rotating roles

15 min

Michelle Polchow

Team Charter Document (Confluence)

Sherry - Notes
Jharina -Time Keeper

Sarah - Action Items

4

Multi-Series E-Collections

Introduce problem statement

20 min

Lisa MacKinder

Documents:
CDL proposals for handling electronic resources with “multi-part” collections

Three proposed CDL models

  • Discussion leaned toward allowing CDL to determine this on a case-by-case basis, with feedback from Discovery as needed. Importance was stressed for allowing CDL/SCP to manage their workflows efficiently.

  • Questions: Who determines what is the best user experience? If CDL solicited voting among campuses, how would a final determination be made? Campuses may consider local activations if an NZ activation doesn’t meet their needs. How might this affect a Primo database list (and how many campuses use this feature?)

Potential options:

  • motion for further discussion

  • motion to ask SOT to have Discovery Subteam review

  • other?

Lisa Mackinder
continue brainstorming how to parse response to case by case handling of collection level records if no consensus by campuses. (Role for Discovery feedback?)

5

Impact Statement on Electronic Resources Management - December 2021
From AEFG

Introduce problem statement and recommendations from AEFG

20 min

Carla

Documents:
Impact Statement on Electronic Resources Management - December 2021

E-Resources Workflow Legacy v. Alma

  • Members are asked to review the Impact Statement & workflow documents & consider ideas for new workflows UC-wide or at their campuses

Lisa Mackinder
look into possibility of biweekly CDL meetings on eresources.

6

Wrap Up

Review actions and decisions

5

67

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

78

Total

x/x