Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees

  • Jharina Pascual, (acting vice-chair) UCI

  • Sarah Sheets, UCM

  • Katie Keyser, UCSF

  • Kevin Balster, UCLA

  • Carla Arbagey, UCR

  • Sherry Lochhaas, CDL

  • Michelle Polchow, Chair, UCD

  • Natalee Bell, UCSB

  • Jason Dezember, UCB

  • Sarah Lindsey, UCSC (substituting for Tamara)

  • Judy Keys, UCSD

Not in attendance:

Not in attendance:

  • Jharina Pascual, (acting vice-chair) UCI

  • Tamara Pilko, Vice Chair, UCSC (on leave)

Meeting documents:
Meeting Recording & Chat (link to file in Google Drive)

45

Background:
Open Access Resource Management Task Force in their Phase 2 Report

Current definition:
https://cdlib.org/services/collections/licensed/policy/open-access-resources-at-the-uc-libraries/

Requesting feedback on our draft document here

The following questions may help guide your feedback: 

  • Does the definition of OA generally align with UC Libraries’ understanding/expectations of what might be labeled as OA in UCLS? 

  • Do the definition and evaluation criteria allow for inclusion of too much content, or are they prohibitive? 

  • Is there any other feedback you would like to share about this draft document? 8

    Item

    Desired Outcome

    Time

    Who

    Notes

    Decisions

    Actions

    1

    Record: Michelle

    Announcements

    Share announcements

    • Sandbox refresh 2/12

    • UCLA customer service visit at end of month -doc - OK to add issues, put your name next to additions in case of questions

    Review team process for agenda note taking and management vs. work plan management

    5 min

    Notetaker: Judy Keys - semi-permanent (quarterly)
    Time Keeper: Kevin Balster - permanent – standing 11 am mtg
    Actions: Natalee Bell For access issues related to renewals, continue to use CDL Helpline; forward any vendor e-mails regarding renewals to Sherry

    Steering committee to determine how to rotate notetaker/time keeper/action duties - within committee or exclude committee.

    2

    CDLNZ-TF

    Updates

    Should Order Button ticket go to Operational Team for ExL monthly mtgAs TF winds down work, how would Sherry like to convey transition, updates, action items, etc? Keep a running written document, verbally report, etc?

    5 min

    Sherry Lochhaas

  • Order button issue - ticket in with Ex Libris, contact Gem who is the owner of the ticket

  • 3

    Helpline Update

    Updates

    5 min

    Sherry Lochhaas

    Email sent out this week

    Send questions to Sherry

    •  Michelle Polchow to debate survey on what systems each campus uses to track tickets.

    April or June - winding down for TF

    LEAVE ON AGENDA - Michelle Polchow

    3

    Joint ACQ + ERES Meetings

    Meet once a month

    ERES- Thursdays 10 am - 11 am

    ACQ - Mondays 1 pm - 2 pm

    March 16 invite ACQ to joint meeting Michelle Polchow meet with Stacy

    4

    Agenda building

    Share the work

    • create agenda

    • assign roles - DONE

    • work plan docs -

    • communicate with All-Chairs and other subteams

    • communicate with other stakeholders (CDL, SCP, etc)

    Balance work plan vs immediate campus concerns (example - UCB’s Shibboleth concerns)

    DecisionsSarah Sheets Sherry Lochhaas Paula Pascual Michelle Polchow

    5

    Discovery Work plan - CDI Limit by Availability

    Test case in reporting as a stakeholder.

    All-Chairs asked for chairs to read through all work plans to see where cross-over topics might occur.

    Comments - ERES consider all possible settings?
    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/040Resource_Management/080Configuring_Resource_Management

    10 min

    Michelle Polchow

    CDI Limit by Availability [Phase 4 delegated]

    • Keep Easy Active setting in mind when troubleshooting

    • Local settings can be changed / be aware of these settings when we are troubleshooting as a group

    • Need to make sure librarians & public service staff understand the implications of these options (and are made aware of any changes)

    Idea Exchange - All-Chairs needs input from all Subteams “Ability to run Analytics reports on Alma Configuration settings

    Review UCSC suggested recommendations - agree or modify our vote based on these suggestions
    UCSC has submitted recommendations

    15 min

    Michelle Polchow

    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/050Administration/050Configuring_General_Alma_Functions/210Alma_Code_Table_Reference

    • How should we vote on this item? Which group would benefit the most - fulfillment, acquisitions, etc.?

    • License settings would be useful for our group

    • Discussion o the UCSC recommendations list: advocating for licensing terms, related records, online services order

    Our group voted to support licensing terms, related records, online services order

    ERES (Michelle Polchow Jason Dezember Judy Keys Katie Keyser Kevin Balster Natalee Bell Paula Pascual Sherry Lochhaas Tamara Pilko)

    6

    Feedback for OARM-PT

    Request comment on defining OA - reminder to read for discussion at next meeting

    7

    Work Plan prioritization

    Review survey responses

    • prioritize deliverables

    • assign deliverables

    https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1KVHVZ3mxeTQJhAAhLarkxvRAXtD25uC8u15KjDdnE54/edit#responses

    • Top priorities include: perpetual rights tracking, authentication/authorization protocols, space to discuss local e-resource practices, multi-series electronic collection level request

    • Sharing of e-resource licensing information across campuses was the least priority

    Additional process work on NZ/IZ de-duplication/reconciliation. Sarah Sheets

    7

    Notes:
    Workplan Items Prioritization

    SWOT for ERES

    • strengths

    • weaknesses

    • opportunities

    • threats

    Notes left here from prior meetings
    Planning + Prioritization

    15

    Paula Pascual

    Ongoing notes:

    • Agreement on needing to go over work plan again, and whether it still reflects campus priorities

      • Need to prioritize things on the plan

      • asking for feedback - are the things that are high priority for campuses, or need attention, reflected on the work plan?

      • Multi-series e-collection level records:

        • CDL working on this? Need to follow up on status

      • Sharing of e-resource licensing info across UC:

        • still high priority for UCI

        • original recommendation is for CDL to host listserv. Need to follow up on status

      • Shared decisions around the CZ:

        • No campuses seem to be struggling with this.

        • Consider removing from the work plan

      • Additional process work on NZ/IZ deduplication:

        • RM may be working on this more

        • Current language is a bit vague

        • Potential issues:

          • coverage dates if a resource is activated in more than one place

          • possible to purchase eDDA title that’s already owned by CDL

          • any others?

        • Need page to document use cases

      • CDL/campus e-resource workflow:

        • CDL working on it

      • reporting/analytics

        • some covered by project team

        • ongoing sharing in ERES

      • Scoping IP ranges

        • gather status at each campus?

        • engage Discovery - probably delegate

      • Perpetual access

        • create a policy page about the mechanics between IZ and NZ and how portfolios show coverage (IZ trumps NZ) “Best Practice” for recording IZ perpetual access

        • need to flesh this out/break down into components - long term v short term goals consortially. What do we need to know in this area?

      • Space for discussing current campus practices/workflows

      • E-Resources troubleshooting communication

        • Is Slack working? Need another avenue?

      • Where are we at with multi-series e-collection records? SCP/CDL seems to be doing alright in determining which collections to activate for Primo; this issue may come up again when POLs are attached to collections

      • Sharing licensing information: determined that a database of licenses is not realistic, however we may clear sharing licenses with campus council as a CA Public Records Act request

    •  Paula Pascual Check with Sherry/CDL about multi-series e-collection level records and sharing of license info
    •  Sherry Lochhaas to take back to the group to discuss further.
    •  Team to review priorities and review next week.
    •  Michelle Polchow to send out survey on priorities.

    9

    Items of Concern

    • Single-sign On (shibboleth) (Jason) new topic for 1/26/2023

    Information Sharing

    10

    All

    • Add to work plan

    108

    Wrap Up

    Review actions and decisions

    3 min

    119

    Parking Lot

    Capture important topics for future discussion:


    1210

    Total

    60/60