Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Marcia Barrett

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Israel Yáñez

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees (Survey Analysis Subgroup)

Regrets

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

START RECORDING

Survey reponses & reports folder

@Marcia Barrett

2

Summaries of Survey Responses

Supporting documentation:

Agreement on content

Completed draft we can share with EIMPT

@Marcia Barrett

Categorize responses:

  • Active discussions, metadata remediation and prioritization, issues observed (columns BB-BE)

  • Non-LC vocabularies and Non-English metadata used (columns BG-BK)

  • Policies and mechanisms for:

    • handling problematic metadata

    • display of problematic metadata in discovery

    • users to report problematic metadata (columns BN-BU)

  • Needs that could be addressed at the system-wide level, role of a UC-wide body, and other thoughts (columns CC-CE)

Some campuses seem to be waiting for system-wide recommendations rather than implementing practices such as using non-LC vocabularies

3

Local Projects

  • Title and short description

  • Context, scope, and goals

  • Outcomes

  • Successful/Unsuccessful

    • List of Local Projects with Descriptions

    Don’t include comments for which we don’t have permission to quote.

    Include all metadata environments are mentioned, not just Alma

    Clearly identify references to Archives work as such

    Israel Yáñez will review the summary of survey responses to remove any comments for which we don’t have permission to quote

    Catherine Busselen will address all metadata environments

    3

    Local Projects

    Decision on how to present this data

    @Marcia Barrett

    Summarize categories of projects – classification, etc.

    Appendix - title & description of project, consider adding outcomeIsrael Yáñez create a draft

    4

    Other information

    Identify other information needed

    Marcia Barrett Israel Yáñez Catherine Busselen Claudia Conrad Naomi Shiraishi Start thinking about what else we want to know (topics for focus groups)

    Map the survey responses to deliverables

    5

    Summary of survey responses

    Identify content to be included in summaryMarcia Barrett Catherine Busselen Naomi Shiraishi

    Israel Yáñez Claudia Conrad

    Think about strong themes from survey responses to include in the Executive Summary

    Naomi Shiraishi will begin to draft the executive summary

    6

    Total

    60 min