Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Sarah Lindsey, Chair

  • Lakshmi Arunachalam, Vice Chair

  • Caitlin Nelson

  • Anna Arrieta, Support Member

  • Jackie Gosselar (Past SILS OT Chair - optional) (out)

8

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Ex Libris support

5 0 min

Team

2

All Chairs meeting update

5 0 mins

Sarah

  • postponed due to time concerns

3

OARM and EIMP in-person presentation

  • decide talking points for the in-person presentation to SILS OT

10 mins

Sarah

Develop 3-5 talking points

  • suggestions from the last SILS OT SC meeting:

    • How can OT support these people? Can we discharge them? How can we advocate for them?

  • feedback from Carla and Erika? (Caitlin?)

    presentations

    • confirm format of this section of the SILS OT meeting

    23 minutes

    Sarah/Caitlin

    • Questions for OARM to address:

      • why should this be a new group? (vs. OST, CKG, etc.)

        • need fewer experts and more diverse expertise

        • could suggest various liaisons with other groups

      • why should this be an ongoing group? (vs. project team)

    • OARM suggests a SILS Knowledge Group (SKG) vs. established CKG, new subgroup, etc.

      • Erica and Carla should include clarification on this point in their presentation.

    4

    OT Workplan

    • currently more of a checklist of tasks, annual or otherwise

    10 0 mins

    Sarah

    • Question from Anna: Should we include this as an agenda item on the next SILS OT meeting?

    • Document for discussion: OT Workplan

    • Suggestions from past meetings:

      • Future API requests

        • Idea proposed at a past SILS OT SC meeting: create mini project team from SILS OT (2-3 people) whose members would share their results in next fiscal year

      • Shared Governance Task Force Ongoing, UCLAS-integrated SILS structure, work practices and charges

        • plan a lengthy discussion of representation?(advocacy/leadership/experts vs. comprehensive campus representation) at a future SILS OT meeting

        • background:

          • related to the question regarding term limits

          • other questions to guide this discussion:

            • if the work changed by having only experts on a team, how would it change?

            • how could non-expert representatives be used in other collective areas?

      • suggestions from SILS OT meeting on 8/7/24:

        • look at Alma/Primo VE Issues and Themes document

          • workstream improvement

        • have list of projects to work on when there is down time

        • strategies for sharing sessions during OT meetings

        • quarterly update (from Gem?) on new releases for assessment/review

    • postponed due to time concerns

    5

    Known Issues

    • Discussion of “do we actually do this?”

    10 0 mins

    Team

    • This came up both from Gem and the notion of “closed tickets without a resolution”. How, if at all, do we want to pursue?

      • make this an OT Workplan eventually?

    • postponed due to time concerns

    6

    Negotiations Team Briefing

    5 mins

    Caitlin

    7

    Executive Session

    • Private Discussion

    5 mins

    Team

    61 minutes

    Team

    • SILS Ops Center update

      • representation concerns

      • collaboration concerns

      • strategizing for future meetings discussed - positive and negative outcomes

    •  Caitlin Nelson will pose a “when is good” poll for a special meeting time related to SILS Ops Center concerns
    7

    Build agenda for next OT meeting

    • Build and finalize the agenda for next week’s OT meeting

    5 mins1 minute

    Team

    • See proposed agenda here

    98

    Parking Lot

    Capture important topics for future discussion

    5 0 mins

    Team

    • Future requests for data

      • Question: do they fall under the privacy agreement we all signed or should there be a separate agreement that needs to be signed?

      • Concern: accidental data viewing vs. purposeful ask for specific data ahead of time - possible contract violations?

    • Signature Success Program

      • paused until after contract renegotiations are complete

      • Prioritized List:

        • Insufficient IZ/NZ integration

        • Insufficient support

        • Limited documentation

        • Insufficient Analytics functionality

        • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

        • Alma usability

        • Quality of CZ collections

        • Acquisitions process improvements

    109

    Total

    60 mins85 minutes