Objective: State the purpose of the group in 25 words or less (brief, energizing). Collegially and collaboratively dissect and analysis complex policy, practice, and workflow procedures disputed by members of functional groups and provide decisions with
clear systematic methodology using open-minded and community-centric decision making. [TM entered 5/1/20]
Achieve the One University, One Library vision by embracing working in shared files, leading others there, and resolving any challenges. [JRiemer entered 5/4/20]We collegially and collaboratively resolve complex policy and practice issues associated with technical services with clear systematic methodology using open-minded and community-centric decision making [derived from the one by TM. Xiaoli entered 5/6/20]We help achieve the One University, One Library vision by embracing working in a shared environment, leading others there, and resolving any challenges and issues associated with technical services [derived from the one by JRiemer. Xiaoli entered 5/6/20]
Roles: What are the duties needed to get the work done? Who will take notes? Who will keep meetings on track/time? Who is responsible for tracking actions?Build meeting agenda -
Meeting agenda building - anyone by Tuesday
Note taking - rotate
...
among membership
Meeting facilitator
...
- Co-chairs overall; particular agenda items have point person who facilitates.
Meeting timekeeper -
...
Communication subgroup?
Co-chairs
Track status of action items - Co-chairs
...
Expectations for working together
...
:
...
Trust each other. Have confidence that the issues discussed will be kept in confidence.
Support each other and be genuine with each other about ideas, challenges, and feelings.
Come prepared for the meetings and discussions
...
. Be present, in person and in attention.
Be accountable and responsible for the team and to the team. If commit to doing something, will do it.
Be open-minded and honesty is
...
valued.
Look for win-win types of solutions, or those that benefit the greatest number of parties.
...
Base decisions on reasons, as much as possible.
Bring a sense of curiosity to discussions. Prioritize understanding the “why” of different points of view.
Maintain focus on the skill set each brings to the group, not individual campus interests.