Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Danielle Westbrook

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Ellen Augustiniak

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees

  • Daisy Nip, CDL

  • Danielle Watters Westbrook, CDL

  • Gem Stone-Logan, CDL

  • Chan Li, Berkeley

  • Lynne Grigsby, Berkeley

  • Alison Lanius, Davis

  • Ellen Augustiniak, Irvine

  • John Riemer, LA

  • Sarah Sheets, Merced

  • Michele Potter, Riverside

  • Heather Hernandez, San Diego

  • Lisa Wong, Santa Cruz

Unable to attend

  • Susan Boone, San Francisco

  • Akshay Agrawal, Santa Barbara

7

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Review the charge

Develop a shared understanding of the roles, responsibilities, principles, etc.

Lynne

  • What is the extent to which we can/should recommend changes to workflows? Affirmed: not for this group to determine that we should change workflows; in part, we’re validating (this is what we’re doing; establishing agreement around our data definitions; some actions are out of scope)

  • In the charge, the data reporting requirements are prioritized in the charge; core goal for 22/23 reporting is to establish a plan/path for UCOP stats reporting and then seek to address the other reporting needs

  • Recognition (from CoUL, DOC) that annual statistics presently take too much time

  • Affirmation: this charge is scoped to data in the SILS/Alma (non-SILS data is out of scope)

  • This team should consider how we define each data requirement (e.g., proposing that we count the item record and not hand counting)

  • Regarding keeping SILS LG in the loop: We don’t want surprises; regular check-in’s and the project team should readily update



2

CDL Op Center setting up tools 

Update

Gem

  •  Gem Stone-Logan will email the group to affirm everyone has Slack and wiki access.
  •  Lynne E. Grigsby will connect with Caitlin, to confirm Google access for project team members.

3

Determining chair, vice chair? co-chair?

Lynne, All

  • The Chair schedules, helps sets agendas and facilitates meetings.

  • Ellen volunteered to serve as Chair, with Chan and Michele joining her in a steering committee.

4

Meeting schedule

5

Wrap up

Review actions and decisions

5

6

All

  • How often do we need to meet? It is an aggressive timeline.

  • Weekly meetings (at least to start; if we split to subgroups, could change the frequency). Aim to have a standing meeting.

See chair action above.

5

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

  • Experts/areas of work where we’ll need to reach out/consult: RLF reporting; Shared print reporting

  • Future topics: Extent to which migration to SILS changes reporting responsibility (previously, campuses reported RLF holdings - what’s the process now?); extent to which special libraries that participate in statistics reporting with their campus library colleagues (e.g., law libraries, health science libraries, potentially affiliated libraries) can be part of harmonization efforts and where that doesn’t work

6

Total

x/x