| 2 | Progress Report for SILS ACQ + ERES | Leadership recommendation for a call to action by ACQ + ERES campus representatives ACQ + ERES Meeting Slides | 40 min | Michelle Polchow Stacy McKenna Erika Quintana Paula Pascual | Meeting slides: Background info on how we got here: AEFG, CDL-NZ Task Force CDL-NZ Task Force Needs Assessment Needs assessment outside scope of CDL-NZ Task Force / SILS Overview of original SILS Principles Desired outcome Proposed action plan Proposed actions for individual members on “Next steps” slide
Q’s/comments: LS: reminder: transition from Phase 4: AEFG crafted impact statement highlighting complexities of e-resources and pushed for additional attention to staffing, but didn’t get traction. LS: In recent CDL-NZ update: signal a work group continuing through fiscal year to ensure POLs in NZ that reflect CDL resources SM in chat: The messaging I'm hoping to convey in case it's a useful template: Our teams are repeatedly encountering barriers to accomplishing SILS missions that require changes to organizational structure, culture, or resource allocation that we can't authorize. Many of these changes are politically charged and likely need involvement of CoUL or even UCoP to be implemented. We are hoping for leadership to prioritize the desired systemwide outcomes (including which can be discarded) and spearhead change management that will give campus and CDL units adequate agency to make progress in areas where Alma's technological capabilities and campus level structures like AP systems can accommodate those outcomes. LM: are we asking for CDL votes? LM: context on specific vote? SL: if needed work falls outside SILS structure, who would be responsible for authoring report and gathering feedback MP: DOC just requests document requesting the group. SM: Tom Bustos might be able to help with request, but need real-world examples encountered in day-to-day operations MP: initial report would be written by ACQ and ERES leads SL: want to make sure everybody’s input would be heard
SL: comment: CDL-NZ group wasn’t asked for input ahead of time on slides covering CDL-NZ group KB & SB: maybe have two votes: one for approving initial draft of proposal for DOC, and one for individual reps. to compile issues to add to report MP: approval for two votes? one for DOC talking points, that can be shared with ACQ & ERES members one for review of SOT’s document with ability to comment (not edit)
LM: Will group have chance to comment on proposal after going through Tom’s group? SL: can we have written statement on what exactly we’re voting for?
| Fist of Five vote: Michelle Polchow, Chair, UCD Stacy McKenna, UC Los Angeles (Chair) Jharina Pascual, (acting vice-chair) UCI Erika Quintana, UC Riverside (Vice Chair)
ERES Jason Dezember, UCB (absent) Sarah Lindsey, UCSC Judy Keys, UCSD Carla Arbagey, UCR Katie Keyser, UCSF Sherry Lochhaas, CDL Sarah Sheets, UCM Kevin Balster, UCLA Natalee Bell, UCSB (absent)
ACQ Osman, Celik, UC Berkeley Lisa Spagnolo, UC Davis Laura Fouladi, UC Irvine Judy Keys, UC San Diego Susan Boone, UC San Francisco Maricel Cruz, UC Santa Barbara - 3 Hiroko Acker, UC Santa Cruz Lisa Mackinder, California Digital Library
| | |