| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Updates - from All-Chairs, Leadership Group, etc. | | 5 mins | Jackie | 12 minutes | Jackie | AC update (Caitlin) discussed how to interface w/ExL on the Signature Success Program and how that works with the current contract negotiations contract negotiation renewal - looking at contract and RFP for major areas of advocacy where items were promised but not delivered scrutinizing areas of advocacy point made by Lynne - “devil is in the details”, viewpoint matters on how contract items are fulfilled and to what extent Jackie mentioned recent SILS OT SC meetings with the current Chair and VC of the Acquisitions group and assisting them with their subteam engagement/recruitment
LG (Lynne) Does not have a Chair yet VC is a 3 year commitment - sometimes a hard ask has not met since 9/18 - no updates keeping an eye on the ILS landscape
| | |
2 | Q & A Session - Including Questions on Slack since last meeting | | 5 mins | Team | 12 minutes | Team | API key for course reserves reading list Greg: daily threshold question - system lists this number as double what was previously thought possible double number confirmed by Lynne ask this question at the next ExL meeting
Blocking IP ranges (Jeremy) Lakshmi - thank you to CDL for resolving the 330 issue quickly
| | |
3 | Topics or questions for the Ex Libris Support Meeting | | 20 mins18 minutes | Jackie/ TeamInvited: Hermine Vermeij, Gem Stone-Logan | Jackie teamUpdates from Gem has not heard of any problems since CJK reindexing finished Lessons learned: ROI on this project was terrible - eventually worked out well, but the process was difficult Be clear about how to contact ExL with issues, need clear communication Sandbox is more like production than ExL previously thought - showed the same issues hard to make predictions about how the NZ will react Consortium tickets - always put in the IZ codes (actual ExL codes for clarity) lingering frustration - ExL states something is not an issue … until it is difference in how ExL and the UCs view delays (down time) - can request more meetings/time when working on a project to clear up questions beforehand ExL is comfortable with ambiguity, whereas the UCs need more concrete answers Not doing all the institutions at once is best
Send additional lessons learned to Gem Questions to ask next time
ExL Support Meeting recap (last meeting was 8/18/23) CJK UCB re-indexing debrief CJK NZ reindexing prep and questions Bring NZ CJK to OT for confidence check on Wednesday; confirm 8pm start time. Craft a communication out to the UC Libraries community to let them know about NZ disruptions (GEM is drafting) Tap Shi Deng for testing CJK in the NZ. (GEM) Discuss AFN patron disruption for the weekend. A banner is probably proportional to the risk. 9am Pacific available just in case for discussion? Should we call Steven in for NZ discussion?
Sandbox refresh:
| 4 | UCLA Dashboard plan review | 20 | | | |
4 | UCLA Dashboard plan review | | 18 minutes | Jackie team | | | |
5 | Pending projects / materials: | FYI updates on anything we’re waiting for | 5 0 mins | Team | | | |
6 | Review/Update OT Workplan | | 5 0 mins | Jackie/ Team | | | |
7 | Executive Session | Private discussion as needed | 5 0 mins | | | | |
8 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | 5 0 mins | | | | |
9 | | Total | 55 mins 60 minutes | | | | |