Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Check-in / updates

Helping to support each other by making space for initial discussion.

2:30-2:45

Chair

Caitlin: PM meeting scheduled with Maria B. next week to flesh out the schedule details - will have more next week.

Xiaoli: Does every campus get specific attention from ExL? Caitlin: No, it’s the ICs who are the reps to ExL. We might change this as specific needs come up.

Lisa: Acq/ERM - we started vendor assignments from ILSDC; started talking about P2E and taking up some critical issues. There’s a question about the current Alma sites being affected by P2E - yes or no? (CN: we will know more about what task applies to which inst after next week too!)

Xiaoli: These decisions - are we thinking about vanguard at this time, and getting it perfect now, or what?

  • CN: I vote for "good enough" for vanguard. If we don't do anything better, we won't learn anything; likewise we don't have to be perfect either since it will be redone.

  • Liz M: That came up in our group too - how “complete” do these decisions have to be? “First best guess” for now. It’s a test for a reason.

  • CH: Agreed.

2

Decisions from the ICs

Triage (at least get the decision assigned) the following decision pages:

  1. Should expired patron records be migrated to Alma? (PDCG)

  2. Single UC-wide patron record database or separate institutional patron databases? (PDCG)

  3. SCP record extraction and Network Zone load decision

  4. Order of Network Zone Record Loading - Vanguard

30

Chair

2:45-3:15

Chair

Necessary to note where these decisions come, because that flavors the question, and implies some dependencies. ex. something that comes from ILSDC will have a “data cleanup” flavor, but may also affect other groups.

  • Assign the decisions

  • Discuss the deadlines

  • Think about next steps?

    • Do any of these decisions need to be broken up?

#3 and #4 - let’s make a subgroup take a look at breaking out these Decision pages.

  • What do we do with existing advisory groups regarding SILS decisions?

    • For anything that would get done in migration or in Alma / Primo, SILS group should take precedence; for anything with current practice / workflow, go to existing advisory group.

  •  Xiaoli Li will send an invite to CN, LM, and LS for subgroup consideration.
3

Critical issues / Decision pages

Move all the critical issues out of spreadsheet and into decision pages

Demo building a decision page 30- turns out it’s not needed at this time

3:15-3:40

Chair

These pages will become a “knowledge repository” of issues we’ve considered - including what priority the issues are.

List of priority terms: See SAMPLE PMOL page: SAMPLE

Current proposal: Mandatory for go-live? (Yes or No) → then decide priority 1, 2, 3, or 4.

FG will run Decision pages by the PPC-SC as needed for help.

4

Homework

15

5

Slides for SCP / ERM

Lessons learned from UCD

5

Homework

Intro to Zones overview on Monday 1-2! CN will be scheduling the consultant to come to the FG meetings in the next few weeks.

6

Parking Lot

Save these issues for future discussion

67

TOTAL

90 / 90

Future agenda items

...