Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Legend:
Status
titlenot started
Status
colourYellow
titleIN PROGRESS
Status
colourRed
titleSTALLED
Status
colourGreen
titledecided
Page Properties
Optional: recommendations on which group(s) might be assigned the work

Status

Status
colourYellow
titleIN PROGRESSIn Progress

Description

Assess the current FRBR behavior /DEDUP options and compare it to expected behavior and user needs. Determine if harmonization is required and provide guidance on the pros/cons of each option.

Impact

High.

Decision summary

Owning group

DISC

Approver

DISC

Consulted

E-Resources, Resource Management

Informed

E-Resources, Resource Management

Priority

High

Dependencies with other groups

Target decision date

Date decided

...

Band-aid

...

Target decision date

...

Date decided

Background

While troubleshooting an issue with deduplication in https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DIS/pages/1878425630/DDA+Records+deduped+with+NZ+Records+aren+t+displaying+request+link+when+signed+in , we discovered that the preferred record behavior may not be as expected.

Various reports have come in, and testing been done locally, to determine that a campus’s available inventory is not being calculated when Primo chooses a preferred record for FRBR display.

As a result, when an institution has a print item, and no electronic item, but their FRBR preferred record is set to ALMA-E, Primo will display a record for an electronic item NOT held by the institution and bury the record and availability information for the print record.

There have been several vaguely related Enhancement requests in the idea exchange, but nothing that outright addresses this problem.

Idea Exchange: "Preferred Record"

Questions to consider

Options Considered [remove if not needed]

FRBR Preferred Record Criteria

...

ALMA P

...

ALMA E

...

ALMA D

...

Description

...

Pros (tick)

...

Cons (minus)

...

The preferred print record isn’t always the newest print record held by the institution.

...

...

Existing Salesforce tickets

Recommendation

Describe the final recommendation/decision.

Impact

Stakeholder group

Impact

Who does this decision affect? [name of the group]

Explain the significance of the decision to EACH stakeholder group. How will this decision impact this particular group? What will change? Do they need to take any action? If so, when?

Reasoning

Background

Questions:

Test Parameters

Preferred Record Configuration: Configuration → Discovery → Display Configuration → Configure Views → Select View → Brief Results

Test View: FRBR Only

Criterion

Value

Define FRBR display for local records

Preferred

Enable FRBR

Yes

Enable Dedup

No

Criteria for FRBR preferred record

Type = Availability
Value = [ALMA-P, ALMA-D, or ALMA-E]

Example of ALMA-D

...

For each Test View Preferred Record type:

  • Look for a FRBRIZED title only available in print at your campus.

  • Look for a FRBRIZED title only available in electronic at your campus.

  • Look for a FRBRIZED title that's available both in print and electronic at your campus.

UCR FRBR/DEDUP Testing 09/2022

UCD FRBR Testing 01/2023

Dependencies

Questions to consider

Action Log

Action/Point Person

Expected Completion Date

Notes

Status

Discovery Reopens FRBR/DeDup Conversation

Initial Testing done with Pros/Cons

Complete documentation and forward to Eresource/Resource Management for review.

Review feedback and Final Decision

Discussion, thoughts, etc.

UCR is drafting an enhancement request…

...