...
Item | Discussion Points | Who | Notes | Decisions / Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Assemble - 5 min
| Notetaker: Ellen Augustiniak | All | ||
2 | Walkthrough of draft review files - 30 min | Daisy |
| Physical inventory totals vs. Risk Management by building reports - RiversideBerkeley, Davis, BerkeleyLA, (2 moreand Riverside (Chan Li Alison Lanius John Riemer Michele Potter) are on standby to help with Daisy’s follow up research | |
3 | "Special" library category designation - 10 min | Question from UCB - how is this designation determined? General question: Do we still need to delineate stats from the NZ by special collections locations (SCA) and non-SCA locations? This was part of the original prototype; it is not used in UCL/UCOP annual stats. With AASA-PT’s original report, our recommendation was that special collections stats should not be generated from the NZ (this was endorsed by CoUL). If a few campuses do use this data - should we provide it to them separately, as opposed to part of this process (that way, everybody doesn’t need to confirm SCA locations each year - reduce workload)? | AllFuture project - do we need these |
| This will be a future project. Summary: do we need separate counts for SCA locations at alldone in the NZ? Campuses that need them for single-campus planning can (i.e., probably should) do them locally.
|
4 | Should we remove the “electronic” and “physical” designation from the resource type labels? (if time) - 10 min | Sample output of what this would look like: | All | Some complications:
| None - ran out of time. |
5 | Wrap up - 5 min | Review actions and decisions | |||
6 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | |||
7 | Total |
...