Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Danielle Westbrook

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Danielle Westbrook

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

May 07, 2021 (2:30 - 3:20 pm)

Zoom: please see Outlook meeting invite.

📢​ Recording of the meeting: forthcoming, to be distributed on the listserv (please note: Zoom-hosted recordings will be available for 120 days after the meeting 🗓​ , after which they are automatically deleted by Zoom).

Attendees

  • Ginny Steel, (co-chair) 

  • Aislinn Sotelo, (co-chair) 

  • Donald Barclay

  • Susan Boone

  • Peter Brantley

  • Kevin Comerford

  • Alan Grosenheider

  • Sarah Houghton

  • Salwa Ismail

  • Cathy Martyniak

  • Felicia Poe

  • Alison Regan

  • Sarah Troy

  • Danielle Westbrook

Guests

  • N/A

Regrets

  • N/A

Agenda and draft discussion notes 🗒​

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Welcome and announcements

Opportunity for brief announcements and notices.

00:05

Ginny, Aislinn, ALL

  • WG charged a subgroup to write the transition team charge (as proposed by SGTF). A draft has been shared with DOC and will be shared shortly with SGTF.

 

 

2

Draft charges UCLAS-integrated SILS:

+ the “source documents” folder

Orient SGTF members with the draft charges and answer questions, to enable/support SGTF to review/edit the charges by Friday, May 14.

00:45

Felicia, Salwa, Sarah T., Sarah H., Danielle

  • SGTF members voiced their appreciation to the subgroup, for such a well-polished set of draft charges.

  • How will the membership be selected? For non-representative teams (like the Leadership Group), who decides membership?

  • Further edits/comments were inserted directly into the draft charges.

Decision: DOC decides membership (particularly pertinent for LG).

Action: SGTF members will add edits/questions/comments to the charges by May 14.

3

 

Total

00:50

 

 

 

 

Future agenda items ✍

  • Accounting for there not being project managers in the ongoing governance structure (via training and support)

  • Continuing the discussion around representative and expertise-based teams

  • Discuss feedback from the End User Name Subgroup exist survey