Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Ginny Steel, (co-chair) 

  • Aislinn Sotelo, (co-chair) - potentially out

  • Donald BarclayPeter Brantley

  • Kevin Comerford

  • Alan Grosenheider

  • Sarah Houghton

  • Cathy Martyniak

  • Felicia Poe

  • Alison Regan

  • Sarah Troy

  • Danielle Westbrook

...

Regrets

  • Salwa Ismail

  • Susan Boone

  • Peter Brantley

Agenda and draft discussion notes 🗒​​

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Welcome and announcements

Opportunity for brief announcements and notices.

To save time, please add announcements to the page in advance of the meeting.

00:00

Ginny, Aislinn, All

  • SGTF presented at the most recent SILS town fall (speaking to phase 4 work and a preview of the ongoing SILS structure).

2

Draft SILS Transition Team Task Force Charge

Review and discuss edits, if any, to the task force charge.

00:15

Aislinn, Donald

  • SGTF members agreed that the charge looks great.

  • There are some concerns about the proposed membership - several/most members are already fulfilling many roles within SILS. Do they have the bandwidth?

  • Decision: Endorsed by SGTF as-is/no edits.

3

Draft work practices for ongoing/UCLAS-integrated SILS

Review draft work practices and discuss further edits/changes.

00:15

Danielle

  • The phase 4 Work Practices document was extremely well received (lots of positive feedback); for this revised Work Practices document, it removes phase 4-specific contexts and teams.

4

Draft charges UCLAS-integrated SILS:

+ the “source documents” folder

Review revised draft charges and determine if further edits/changes are needed before the documents are shared with SILS WG for their initial review (to be transmitted to WG on 05/25).

00:15

All

  • SGTF discussed term-length for the UCLAS-integrated teams, and specifically for the Leadership Group. Both two- and three-year terms were discussed. There is some concern about burn-out, for those who will have also participated in phase 4. Ultimately, given the nature of the work, three-year terms are being proposed; to ensure staggered terms moving forward, some initial terms can be shorter.

5

RCTF charge extension

Outline the topic, to prepare for a discussion and decision at the next SGTF meeting.

00:05

Cathy

  • Some questions/fact-finding will be best carried out once all UC campuses have more experience within Alma. Accordingly, the RCTF’s charge will be extended into 2022 (when we’re under UCLAS-integrated SILS). RCTF currently reports to the SILS Working Group.

  • The work of the Systemwide Print Collection Management Strategy WG intersects with the RCTF’s work; Alison Wohlers (SPCMS) has been engaging the RCTF. Anna Striker is also a connection between SPCMS and RCTF.

  • Several SGTF members reflected that the RCTF report/ and recommendations may have FTE and cost implications; this would necessitate final endorsement from either CoUL or SLFB.

Action: SGTF will consider the following questions in advance of the next meeting:

  • Given the new RCTF timeline, who should RCTF report to starting Jan. 2022 (when phase 4 concludes)?

  • Who needs to receive (and endorse) the recommendations/final report?

6

 

Total

00:50

 

 

 

 

Future agenda items ✍​

...