...
Not Attending:
Notetaker: Nicole ArnoldErica Zhang
| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
---|
1 | Gather & Announcements | Assemble as a group and share info | 2.5 | Team | |
| |
2 | Review | Understand the context for the group; familiarize ourselves with the charge; get a sense of the future of the group | 2.5 | Team | OARM Task Force: OARMTF Principles?
| | Carla will link these documents in our group’s landing page |
3 | Report back from SILS groups | Learn what impact the 3 options for OA management might have on SILS groups, their thoughts on OA | 15 | Carla Arbagey Jared Campbell | E-Resources - Carla Resource Management, Discovery - Jared Others? RMFG feedback: 2022-07-21 Meeting notes Davis: interested in Models 2 and 3; have done some local OA cataloging and continue to do that in a limited basis, but interested in exploring hybrid possibilities; haven’t done much local OA cataloging since migration; large-scale collections should probably go to SCP UCLA: relatively good capacity for OA cataloging via any models Riverside: have capacity to do one-off things, but anything large-scale, maybe should go to SCP SCP: could accommodate monographs via getting an OCLC number; may open the door for relooking at current policies that SCP doesn’t take monographs right now E-resources group: a possibility is activating OA collections like previously done in SFX, but question is if records are good enough? There’s also probably a lot already migrated from SFX, and CDL will turn on what’s not yet turned on (SCP will turn on all the OA collections that are migrating). Complications include if whether campuses want to see it, how collections are set up; Another potential way to get around activating is using Unpaywall. Summary: Several campuses don’t have capacity for local OA cataloging; SCP requests are also slow, likely because of priority post-migration projects; this is a good time to be thinking about OA workflows before things ramp up
| | Becky to ask UCSD if they have Unpaywall, and how it works |
4 | Report back from campuses, SCP | Learn what impact the 3 options for OA management might have on local staff | 20 | Team | For SCP: what’s the volume of OA cataloging requests received, which campuses are making requests? 17 requests this year for journals 5 requests this year for collections 11 requests last year for collections 10 requests in 2020 for collections SCP also has a program that can evaluate CZ records for quality
| | Becky to gather information |
5 | Limit by Availability Feature | Status of Discovery work plan to investigate Limit by Availability Feature | 10 | | | | |
6 | Wrap up & Homework | Review actions and decisions | 5 | Team | One approach could be to activate everything and then have a nomination for enhancing metadata Maybe we should take one OA resource as a pilot and see it through a workflow from evaluation to activation (e.g. a journal from “Free e-journals” collection)
| | Everyone: Identify potential OA collections/scenarios to run through workflows |
7 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | 5 | Team | How to find items that are OA but have slipped thru the cracks, not being labeled OA? Draft work plan document Something coming from Discovery group Discussion on CZ records Another area is to rethink JSC and whether they want to continue approval role.
| | |
8 | | Total | 60/60 | | | | |
...