2022-07-21 Meeting notes

Updates/announcements (Please add in advance)

10 mins

Hermine (UCLA)

• Finalizing our bound-with procedures. Basically we’ll be using the 774 method with some tweaks--we found that leaving the parent record unsuppressed and making the 245 more descriptive led to a much better display.

Yoko (UCR)

• Decided to use the 773 method for new bound-with titles.

Let Liz know if you want to be the RM rep on the team ASAP

RM Feedback for the OA project team

Discuss proposed models for UC OA resource management, ask for campus feedback before 7/21

• Specific questions:

  • What are the pros and cons of each model?

  • What impact would models #2 & #3 have on your technical services staff?  Is there support and/or bandwidth to have some of this work done at a local level?

20 mins

Open Access Resource Management Project Team

https://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/OARMTF_Phase_Two_Report_Mar_2022.pdf

Marcia: According to Tamara Pilko, the co-chair of the task force, it is possible to use all three models for different scenarios. Locally, UCSC has been taking care of OA cataloging adhoc.

UCLA: prefer to have SCP to take care of the big packages and locally load small ones.

UCB: no bandwidth to support OA cataloging at the moment.

UCM: no resource for OA cataloging

UCI: no bandwidth and knowledge to tackle various decisions related to OA cataloging. Like the pilot idea.

SCP: just recently compared the gap between CDL IZ and NZ, in terms of OA resources, found a few not in NZ. Will discuss at E-Resource Team on whether to activate CZ OA collections identified, or on activate CDI only collections which may require local campuses to register separately in addition.

Liz: there was a clear priority list in terms of cataloging for SCP. Now it might be a good time to reprioritize.

Shi: for single monographic title cataloging requests, SCP sends the request back to the campus.

Adding 520 fields to IZ-only records to exclude from the Discovery Network

Provide any updates from the DISC group, discuss pros/cons/use cases

15 mins

The exact note in 520 will appear in Primo. Folks are wondering why the DDA record from UCSC shows in some campuses' Primo but not others'. It could be the different Primo configuration that contributes to the inconsistency.

Marcia: UCSC has submitted a ticket on this issue back in January.

Liz: UCSD used 899 in laptop bib records seemed to work but the odd phrase appears in Primo.

Yoko: some group (Discovery?) is working on hosting a systemwide session on explaining how Discovery Network works.

Local campus' Primo configurations: Campus Select Configurations

Maybe submit a new Salesforce ticket that focuses on this inconsistency.

Bring some examples to discuss with Discovery Group about what happened and possible solutions.

Talk to your colleague about what each campus can and want to do first.

Use UCSC records to test.

Liz will follow up with Hermine, Marcia, and Adam for further exploration

UC/ExL Meeting for CJK Search results update

5 mins

Meeting will be this coming Monday, July 25 10-11.

Background page: Searching Alma/Primo for CJK languages

Feel free to forward the Zoom invite to colleagues who might be interested

Parking Lot/additional discussion

Limited Search Functionality in Alma and Analytics

• EL has been asked repeatedly to index all MARC fields. There is a limit on the number of local parameters we can set up, and there is a need to identify data that is not indexed (example, content type)

• Alma Idea Exchange: Add 880 field to the Bibliographic Details dimension table in Analytics

Sharing session idea - fun with the CZ? (Maybe in conjunction with e-res?)

Evaluate and refine WDU configuration

/60