| Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions |
|---|
| 1 | STANDING ITEM) Subteam Roundup | Check-in on OSTs - capture any shared issues or cross-team task | 10 | Team | Disc: RM: ERES: RS: Working up the combined subgroup for LUO material with a secondary interest in RLF barcodes. |
|
|
| 2 | Questions from Slack | FYI on anything quick that came up | 5 | Team | | | |
| 3 | OT / LG updates | Inform on salient issues from OT and LG | 5 | Jackie | SILS LG meeting fell on the holiday (3/29) so it was cancelled. OT SILS Membership Transition Subgroup Charge: 2024 UPDATE DRAFT roster approved by OT next ExL support managers meeting is 4/19/24 SILS OT SC 90 minute meeting on 3/27/24 included 30 minute meetings with both OARM-PT and EIMP-PT discovered lots of overlapping issues OARM-PT is able to move forward with new team members empowered to make decisions EIMP-PT issues cover a variety of areas, some that extend beyond SILS question of CKGs current roles and decision making abilities
RNPT “Topical” meetings are done and next is to wrangle our writing to them and their response. Aiming to have something final in May, final deadline CoUL meeting in June.
Accessibility | | |
| 4 | Around the table conversation | Explore topics of interest to the group | 20 | Team | Update on the barcode issue: There is an existing subgroup within RSOST/FFOST that includes RLF staff that can take on a first pass of that issue. Doesn’t need a charge or anything at this point. OT was wondering about whether covering the barcode would impact digitization projects? legacy item is part of the item and still searchable. UCB also wants a secondary barcode field, for other reasons.
RLFs on SILS groups? Any other structural ideas about SILS gov? Discovery: like the representative model, it really works for every campus. Chair-VC method works okay for us. eResources: I’ve been thinking that sometimes we feel like we don’t know if we’re the right group for some issues. RMOST: there are times when I’ve thought that our group could lost the representative part, because it’s not really talking about “how does your campus do it” and we’re mostly working on the systemwide level. And for some campuses it is hard to come to a lot of meetings… We might be a candidate for becoming an expertise group. But would it slow things down? We’d need a clear way for getting feedback from campuses… OT - we batted that cochair idea around in OT, but also why not peel off some responsibilities to the vice chair. Current responsibilities: https://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/SILS_UCLASintegrated_updated111723.pdf
| | |
| 5 | Wrap up | Review actions and decisions | 5 | Team | | | |
| 6 | Parking Lot | Capture important topics for future discussion | 5 | | | | |
| 7 | | Total | 50 minutes | | | | |