Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Date

, 10am-11:30am

Attendees

  • Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine

  • Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles

  • Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego

  • Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair)

  • Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library

  • Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara [Today’s Notetaker]

Not attending

  • Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced

  • Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside

Discussion items

DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Updates from other SILS groups

Share relevant items

10 min

Jess

Josephine

PPC Discovery needs fill out its section on PPC’s (Test load) Configuration Form by 1/20.

Special Primo VE configuration mtg with Discovery: ExL short on time to set one up before 2/5. Check in with Discovery FG members: Did they feel ExL answered their Primo VE config form questions?

  • UCB, UCSF, UCSD noted it wasn’t very detailed and barely covered Primo.

  • Not going to push with a one-on-one with ExL.

Primo VE Workshop will spread over five days. Date is still TBD and looks to have to be at/after mid-May. It’s a workshop that is usually given after go-live.

Reference:

2

Upcoming Primo VE Training and Tasks

Inform timeline items

5 min

Josephine

(details to come)

3

Finalize Search Profiles

Make final decision

45 min

All

  • Including the NZ with “almost everything” scope: UCSD, UCLA, UCSB, UCSF, CDL, UCB, UCI, UCD, UCSC are good with it

  • Importance of getting CDL records to view

    • Boosting

  • Worldcat scope: UCSD, UCLA, UCSB, UCSF, CDL, UCSC is interested in having it for test.

    • UCB, UCI not interested in having Worldcat scope

    • some ambivalence with lack of functionality, There’s interested in way to link out to the native interface. Interested to look at and test it.

    • Systemwide API key for it

  • CDI assumption of being in the “almost everything” scope:

    • include : UCSD, UCLA, UCSB, UCSF, CDL, UCB, UCI, UCD, UCSC

    • Limit by availability by default or not: UCSD, UCLA, UCSB, UCSF, CDL, UCB, UCI, UCD all want to test. UCSC and UCD wants to try the UCI approach.

    • Should this be something we harmonize on

      • Leaning towards: UCSD, UCLA, UCSB, UCSF, CDL, UCB, UCD, UCSC

      • Leaning against: UCI

  • UC Network search profile:

    • discussion of a best practices mandate-- to allow for flexibility to include/or not a separate UC wide scope. We think it should be configured a certain way and then we will set up a best practice for it.

Reference:

  • Decision: to include CDI in almost everything and harmonize on that.

  • Decision to not harmonize on filter by availability. ERM people need to be consulted on this.

  • Decision to allow for flexibility to include (or not) a separate UC wide scope (in advanced search)

4

WorldCat decision page

Work on drafting

30 min

{See discussion above}

Reference:

5

Homework

Prepares team for next meeting

All

6

Parking Lot/Q&A

Save these issues for future discussion & comments

 

 

 

Note from Sharon Shafer (Unlicensed) regarding agenda item 1. UCLA Library ingested the Film and Television Library catalog records during the Alma data harvest and there was concern about the unique needs of item display and search for the film and television records. UCLA Discovery Functional Group started a document to examine the MARC fields and their function. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qWW7wr3pWau7wbAbthSB9lLcv3T0xYol990FV48MpbM/edit Should we share this with RMFG?

  • No labels