Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Attendees

  • Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Sean Claudio, UC Irvine 

  • Joshua Gomez, UC Los Angeles 

  • Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced

  • Jessica Kruppa, UC Riverside, Chair 

  • Michele Mizejewski, UC San Francisco

  • Michael Craig, UC Santa Barbara 

  • Gem Stone-Logan, California Digital Library

  • Dominique Turnbow, UC San Diego, Vice Chair

Not present:

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz


Zoom Link to meeting (10 am): https://ucr.zoom.us/j/91924598177?pwd=VlNDV0srcWNocWtFcEtsTnhRcFdFZz09

Meeting Recording:

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Sharing and Updates

Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups

5

All

2

Update: Single OCLC symbol for consortia e-content.

Identify if the new information creates new concerns or if we’ll continue to wait for ILL’s decision.

all

This is in regards to using SCPER for all consortia e-content, not for using a single symbol for regular holdings.


Discussion Page: https://uc-sils.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DIS/pages/1889271842/Discovery+Impact+of+Resource+Management+s+OCLC+Streamlined+Worldcat+Holdings+Project+2022

  • Jessica will e-mail the Resource Management chair with DISC’s concerns and a request for examples to better understand how users will access e-Resources content under a single SCPER symbol.
3

Revisit: Shared Code Repository

Joshua Gomez Gem Stone-Logan

Mobile usability issues

Shared Repository Proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IEdjMzrhoLfOl6a5AmUCevhZywXuiM31jebHhJJ91Hs/edit#heading=h.36u2v11b1agr

Team approved GitHub proposal. Gem is sending it up the ladder.

Joshua, Sean, and Michael will meet to discuss how to best handle reviewing source code.

4

Review: excluding CDI ebooks

Identify pros/cons of including/excluding CDI eBooks from default Articles, books, and more.

all

Discussion Page: Exclude eBooks from CDI Results

UCI Testing View for excluding CDI eBooks

Questions to consider:

  • What are the potential risks of enabling “Exclude eBooks from CDI Results”?

  • Are there any serious current problems that could be solved by enabling “Exclude eBooks from CDI Results”?

Team has not had ample opportunity for testing.

We will revisit this issue when we’ve had time to do actual testing.

  • Jessica will update the Discussion Page to include areas for the team to add questions, thoughts, and updates moving forward.
5

Review: How do the campuses utilize 930/973 fields?

Discussion Page: Discovery Impact: 930/973 fields - Practice for Continued Use

  • Do your local campuses use a local MARC field like 973? Or do they use Alma’s built in tools?

  • Does this use have any impact on the Discovery or is it only a back-end staff use field?

It doesn’t seem like any campus uses the 973 locally to track e-collections anymore, but they do use it for legacy information.

  • Jessica will gather the documentation needed for campuses that may want to keep using the 973 locally going forward
6

Review: Digital Collections Decision Tree

Discussion Page: Digital Collections Decision Tree

  • Jessica will ask DCPT if there are sandbox examples of collections that we can look at so we can better understand the impact each branch of the tree has on discovery.
7

Standing Item: Review Issues Spreadsheet and Parking Lot.

Issue tracking decision still pending (Shared code repository may be involved)

8

Wrap up

Review actions and decisions

5

9

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion:

Discussion Parking Lot / Future Topics

10

Total

45

  • No labels