RLF holdings

Status	IN PROGRESS
Description	How should holdings from NRLF and SRLF (Northern and Southern Regional Library Facilities - the UC Libraries high-density storage facilities) be reported for various interested parties?
Decision summary
Owning group	AASAP Team sils-aasa-l@listserv.ucop.edu
Approver
Consulted	AASAP Team members Shared Print and RLF experts
Informed	Leadership Group
Decision-making process
Priority
Target decision date	19 May 2023
Date decided	[type // to add Date]

Recommendation

Provide counts of RLF materials xyz

Stakeholder group	Impact
UC Libraries	Determinations around what and how we report are for the most part managed/owned by the UC Libraries (i.e., shared ownership).
CDL	CDL analysts, who are responsible for building report queries at the Network Zone according to templates agreed upon by the UC Libraries, must exclude items based a variety of parameters…
UCOP	Likely, this specifically pertains to our Risk Management Office, who reports holdings information to our insurer, for compliance purposes.

	Pros	Cons
Option 1 - part of UCB & UCLA
Option 2 - RLFs as distinct reporting units
Option 3 - Holdings attributed to depositing campus.

Action/Point Person	Expected Completion Date	Notes	Status
Gather feedback from experts	17 Apr 2023	See meeting notes: 2023-04-17 10 am AASA-PT Meeting Notes
x	<date>