Date
, 10am-11:30am
Attendees
Jared Campbell, UC Davis
Ellen Augustiniak, UC Irvine
Sharon Shafer, UC Los Angeles
Elizabeth Salmon, UC Merced
Michael Yonezawa, UC Riverside [Today’s Notetaker]
Heather Smedberg, UC San Diego
Josephine Tan, UC San Francisco (co-chair) [Today’s Timekeeper]
Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz (co-chair)
Sarah Houghton, California Digital Library
Chizu Morihara, UC Santa Barbara
Lisa Ngo, UC Berkeley
Not attending
Discussion items
DISCOVERY VISION: We strive to design and implement the best possible discovery and delivery experience for our end users using data-driven decision making. We envision a network zone experience that will allow users to discover library materials across UC collections without sacrificing relevant results. As such, the default search and results interface should prioritize the success of typical users while providing additional functionality for more advanced users.
Item | Desired Outcome | Time | Who | Notes | Decisions | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New items on Discovery Confluence and Google Drive | What’s new that’s been added this past week | 5 min | Jess |
| ||
2 | Updates from other SILS groups | Share relevant items | 10 min | Jess Sarah |
| Lena’s reply[7/23/20]: “the first step is {for Discovery} to make recommendations on branding to the SILS Working Group before any actions are taken. It's too early to consider hiring a designer and who would work with the designer. Your research/consulting may indicate that a logo is not needed. It would be useful in your recommendations to include a timeline/deadlines for when you need various deliverables.” | |
3 | Check-in: Subcommittees for Primo VE Branding | Update on progress and any questions to work towards completing Decision Page for Primo VE Branding | 10 min | All | Environmental Scan: Ellen, Lisa, Chizu Literature Review for best practices: Heather, Elizabeth, Michael Accessibility/SEO: Sarah, Sharon, Jared Subcommittee reports located in two places:
|
| |
4 | Feedback on Discovery Network Scope and Consortia Union View Summary | View feedback gathered from local campuses | 15 min | All | Answer from ExLibris re: staff benefits of a union view? As to workflow efficiencies using a union view, it has to be discussed in ALMA collaborative network how your consortium will share centrally managed resources, and how to use fulfillment network to support requests and view online services from other institutions. Primo VE is just a discovery and delivery layer for ALMA. There is no web crawling or Search Engine Optimization benefits to having a union view.” | ||
5 | Look at Chapters 14 & 15 to see if any recommendations need to be made for Primo VE configuration in prep for Vanguard data load | 20 min | All | ||||
6 | Discuss Discovery Work Flow planning | Look at the DISCOVERY FG - Roles, Charges & Deliverables, and Decision-Making Workflow to determine our group’s plans for prioritizing our deliverables {These notes are on the Team Charter page} | 30 min | All |
Group Purpose The primary focus of the Discovery FG will be making decisions related to the implementation and configuration of the Primo VE NZ instance. The FG will also act as consultants to local/campus implementation teams, who are responsible for local (institutional zone) instances. Charges & Deliverables Specific to Discovery FG
Membership Skills:
| ||
7 | Homework | Prepares team for next meeting | All |
| |||
8 | Parking Lot/Q&A | Save these issues for future discussion & comments |
|
|
|
|