Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Current »

Meeting information

(2:30 - 3:20 pm)

Zoom: please see Outlook meeting invite.

📢 Recording of the meeting: forthcoming, to be distributed on the listserv (please note: Zoom-hosted recordings will be available for 120 days after the meeting 🗓 , after which they are automatically deleted by Zoom).

Attendees

  • Ginny Steel, (co-chair) 

  • Aislinn Sotelo, (co-chair) 

  • Donald Barclay

  • Susan Boone

  • Kevin Comerford

  • Alan Grosenheider

  • Sarah Houghton

  • Salwa Ismail

  • Cathy Martyniak

  • Sarah Troy

  • Danielle Westbrook

Guests

  • N/A

Regrets

  • Peter Brantley

  • Felicia Poe

  • Alison Regan

Agenda and draft discussion notes 🗒

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Housekeeping

Opportunity for co-chairs and members to share brief announcements and notices.

00:05

Ginny

  • N/A

 

 

2

SGTF mid-phase assessment

SGTF members should review the draft survey and consider the following questions in advance of the call:

  • Do these questions meet the goals we set for the assessment?

  • Are any questions confusing?

  • Are any questions unnecessary?

  • Are we missing any questions?

On Friday’s call, the task force will determine if edits/changes are required or whether we can proceed with building the survey.

00:35

Alan, Kevin, Sarah

  • Many thanks to Alan, Kevin and Sarah for drafting the initial survey!

  • When you look at the resulting data, we’ll need to be able to discern what feedback is specific to local governance and systemwide.

  • Additional feedback was inserted directly into the draft survey.

  • Action: The subgroup will review the feedback and make additional changes to the survey based on today’s conversation.

  • Action: Danielle will confirm the survey tool available at CDL; she’ll check-in with the subgroup to see if it meets our needs.

3

Integrating SILS into UCLAS

Re-review the current UCLAS, DOC’s role and the kind of governance groups that report to DOC (leadership group, strategy team).

Proposal: form a subgroup to further consider and develop how, structurally, SILS governance and operations can be integrated into UCLAS.

00:10

Ginny

  • Action: Sarah T., Felicia and Salwa will form a subgroup. Danielle will provide staff support.

4

 

Total

00:50

 

 

 

 

Future agenda items ✍

  • Further work on assessment, as led by the subgroup (Alan, Kevin).

  • Further discuss UCLAS, what we might learn from an assessment of our phase 4 shared gov. structure, and initial and ongoing shared governance needs.

  • Initial brainstorm/discussion about operational SILS shared governance (based on the assumptions already identified).

  • No labels