Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Legend: NOT STARTED IN PROGRESS STALLED DECIDED

Status

IN PROGRESS

Scope

IMPLEMENTATION

Description

Primo VE configurations recommendations for harmonization

Decision

See below

Owning group

Discovery FG Josephine Tan and Jess Waggoner, co-chairs

Approver

n/a

Stakeholders

R = Discovery FG
A = Discovery FG
C = Resource Management FG, Fulfillment & ILL FG, Acquisitions & e-Resources FG
I = Implementation Coordinators

Decision-making process

  1. Ran functionality and usability testing in VG phase in consultation with other FG’s

  2. Created recommendations for Primo VE configurations for harmonization based upon subgroup reports covering the topics of Library Catalog Materials, ILL, CDI, and Special Collections & Archives

Priority

Mandatory before Go-live

Due date

TBD

Recommendations

Refer to Recommendations page for list of Primo VE configuration recommendations that provide directions and links to documentation on how to implement the recommendations.

Reasoning

The recommendations are for the purposes of test load harmonization. Further evaluation will be done during test load to provide other suggestions that do not necessarily need to be harmonized.

Background

Primo VE instances for all ten campuses during test load were delivered with out-of-the-box Primo VE defaults. Discovery FG evaluated the components of search scopes, basic and advanced search, facets, brief results display, and item full record display. The recommendations are intended to make the Primo VE user experience more intuitive and self-explanatory by adjusting the naming of certain facets and improving descriptions of contents, results, and services related to discovery and delivery.

Dependencies

No dependencies identified

Questions to consider

  • Are these recommendations ideal for harmonization to maximize positive user experience?

  • Are there any other recommendations that will need harmonization?

Action/Point Person

Expected Completion Date

Notes

Status

Partnering subgroups collaborate with FG’s for usability testing

Feb 19, 2021

Complete

Integrate recommendations made by subgroups' reports to reflect components of the initial set-up workbook items

March 12, 2021

Complete

  • No labels