Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

03:10-04:30 PM

Zoom: contact chair for link and password

Attendees

Not attending

Discussion items

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Local group takeaways

Actions

1

Updates (please add in advance)

10 mins

Liz:

  • We had an issue with data not showing up in Analytics despite being submitted before the “last updated” date shown in Alma. We submitted a Salesforce ticket and will update if we hear anything

Belinda (UCSC)

  • We are having issues with 020s added to OCLC records not coming over to the NZ. Would it be possible/advisable to change the merge rule?

Jean:

  1. UCB print serials items records are not sorting properly. The sorting is related to the Millennium migrated holdings and item records. Millennium records do not have 853 fields to designate volume etc. information in the holdings record. All Millennium volume numbers are loaded in Alma's Description field of the item record. Without volume designations, Alma does not sort items properly. 

So Berkeley is considering switching from our Millennium traditional practice to MARC 21 holdings format (NISO standard). Does this need Systemwide's approval? Can individual campuses make our own decisions?

2. UCB governance people (not just the catalogers) talked about noticeably slow response times, but said they don’t want to hurt our relationship with ExL, so are treading diplomatically through it with them. Our SLA (service level agreement) seems to be involved.

3.Having received a couple of notifications from other campuses about errors in UCB records: 

Do we want some sort of list of campus contacts for record issues? And, when there are multiple holdings, which campus will correct the issue? 

But such a list would require upkeep.

And any problem reports should include a clear and obvious indication of priority.  For instance, a multi-match problem would definitely impede another campus from proceeding with their work, whereas many or most other errors could be fixed ... sometime.  Many of these reports would be coming to my department, and we do not have the capacity to resolve all possible problems from all corners of UC, a situation unlikely to change anytime soon.


4. UCB would be glad if we could keep holding off a bit on WorldCat Updates.We still have to get going on undoing the UCLA/OCLC merging issue (the ones that’re safe to work on now anyway).

2

Authority reports/cleanup

Review current reports, how to handle these?

3

MARCIVE

Gem ran some new normalization on the records in the sandbox including:

Adding the OA 506

Adding the SCP 930

How do these look now?

4

Bound-withs/related records

Adding campus names

Ready to run in production?

UCB: Still in the middle of deciding about 910s, and wanting to hear all news from Systemwide.

5

$x and Primo’s over zealous linking

See TJ’s email from Friday

6

856 42s

7

Next meeting (10/24)

MVP check-in

WorldCat updates

  • No labels