Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Legend: NOT STARTED IN PROGRESS STALLED DECIDED

Status

IN PROGRESS

Description

Locate Profile Updates (uncheck “locate by metadata”)

Decision summary

Based on suggestion from ExL, uncheck “locate by metadata” selection in all UC locate profiles in NZ & distribute to IZs.

Owning group

Intercampus Resource Sharing SILS-RS-L@listserv.ucop.edu

Approver

Consulted

Informed

Decision-making process

Priority

Target decision date

Date decided

[type // to add Date]

Recommendation

Implement Ex Libris’s suggestion to uncheck ‘locate by metadata’ in all UC locate profiles (harmonized) in NZ & distribute from NZ to IZs.

After 14 days of making change, ascertain what effect has occurred for mismatches & non-supplied requests in WSILL.

Method to ascertain effect:

Compare the time period since the change with a similar time period prior to the change.

  • Mismatches:

    • percentage of canceled digitization lending requests (articles)

    • for books (loans), lessening of patron complaints

  • Nonsupply: percentage of requests that entered borrowing nonsupply queue

  • Other metrics as available at local campus

    • locally collected data

    • re-testing reported errors

Fourteen days after implementation, assess situation and pursue further with Ex Libris as needed - more decision pages may be needed.

Reasoning

Background

During phase 4, FFG discovered & reported many issues with mismatches within the AFN. After escalation of tickets with Ex Libris, ExL requested a task force with UC to review their testing and make suggestions.

Notes from ExL/UC AFN Task Force January 2022 meeting

ExL suggested to uncheck the “locate by metadata” in each of the UC locate profiles in the NZ & distribute to IZs. ExL testing indicated this setting should reduce the mismatched and nonsupply issues reported to ExL. UC assumes the testing was done on the specific examples provided in salesforce cases and may not have included regression tests.

Options Considered

Option 1

Option 2

Description

Harmonize UCs' locate profiles with unchecked ‘locate by metadata’

Non-harmonize UCs' locate profiles with ‘locate by metadata’ setting (some locate profiles checked & some unchecked)

Pros

Ease in understanding effects in overall UC AFN

Compare results between changed & unchanged IZs (may be of limited utility due to other differences between UCs)

Cons

non-changed IZs with all ‘trash’ mismatches in lending queues

non-changed IZs may have larger lending queues (due to more/continued mismatches)

mismatches being filled with incorrect material from non-changed IZ

mismatches hold up sending out borrowing requests from other campuses to WSILL (delaying patron requests)

Dependencies

Questions to consider

How to ascertain effectiveness of change?

fewer mismatches overall?

fewer nonsupplies in WSILL?

How to disambiguate between mismatches & nonsupplies (in tickets?)

for cases that were successful, do those continue to be successful?

Action Log

Action/Point Person

Expected Completion Date

Notes

Status

  • No labels