Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

Attendees

  • Osman Celik (UCB)

  • Lisa Spagnolo (UCD)

  • Laura Fouladi (UCI)

  • Stacy McKenna (UCLA)

  • Latasha Means (UCM)

  • Erika Quintana (UCR)

  • Judy Keys (UCSD)

  • Maricel Cruz (UCSB)

  • Hiroko Acker (UCSC)

  • Susan Boone (UCSF)

  • Adriana Moran, (CDL), Chair

Not attending:

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions

Actions

1

Welcome/Assemble

Allowing people to join from other meetings, etc.

1-2



2

Report on Combined ACQ & E-Res Chair Meeting

Reviewing information as provided from Adriana & determining local questions.

30

Adriana

  • Sharing of CDL-based communications & documentations between local departments, groups, etc.

    • Possibility to use listservs for this purpose, or other communication channels.

    • Can information be embedded into Alma (payment & financial information, collection & title information) and then pulled for reports & reconcilitation?

    • Should local campuses review how internal workflows/communication channels are organized?

  • Considering CSU and NZ/IZ perspectives on how to create, manage, maintain, & communicate consortial resources. Can we/should we have a similar effort to re-org our processes?

  • Could use Sandbox to test functionality -

    • “IOP eBooks 2021 Collection” as first test collection of a new defined book collection without good CZ coverage.

    • Can also use Nature Journals for an example of messy/complicated charges based on separate cost-shares for a journal package.

    • Can find sample “maintenance fee” (Adriana) to provide as sample.

  • Adriana will provide three samples of potential workflows between CDL/local campuses to try in new Sandbox.
  • Potential to create small sub-groups to help CDL with workflow planning and testing (will work with E-Res Group)
  • Potential for IZ to provide temporary access to NZ-users to review space or create a working meeting so both spaces can be seen.
  • Potential question to ExL or to investigate - do changes/jobs/updates to NZ effect IZ (and vice versa).

3

Team Charter

Continuing formulating Team Charter for roles, purpose, working methods.

20

All

Discussion of Slack, roles, other charter content.

  • All: think on Team Charter objective and develop draft in Google Doc
  • All think about other elements on Team Charter.
4

Wrap Up

Review actions and decisions

5

5

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion

6

Total

50/50

30

  • No labels