Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Attendees

  • Jackie Gosselar, UC Berkeley

  • Jared Campbell, UC Davis

  • Sean Claudio, UC Irvine 

  • Joshua Gomez, UC Los Angeles 

  • Joe Ameen, UC Merced

  • Michele Mizejewski, UC San Francisco

  • Jess Waggoner, UC Santa Cruz

  • Jessica Kruppa, UC Riverside, Chair 

  • Gem Stone-Logan, California Digital Library;

  • Dominique Turnbow, UC San Diego, Vice Chair;

  • Michael Craig, UC Santa Barbara

Not present:


Meeting Recording:

Item

Desired Outcome

Time

Who

Notes

Decisions / Discussion

Actions

1

Sharing and Updates

Share any Discovery related information from other SILS groups

5

All

User Settings for Persistent Search History: This is functional. It is off by default and must be configured by each institution.
See Release Notes, scroll down to User Settings for Persistent Search History, then scroll past Analytics - Persistent Search History to find Configuration Options.

2

WorldCat Link Updates

Review spreadsheet and offer suggestions or input by August 26.

Resources link is out of date at some, maybe all campuses.

Do people have opinions?

Are the links correct?

Gem

“It sounds like many of the existing custom links don’t currently work and since WCD is no longer our primary discovery layer they’d like to standardize what is entered.  They are proposing replacing existing custom links with 3 links for each campus and CDL: 1) Off-campus Access 2) UC Library Search 3) Library Website. “

3

Tentative: Discovery UX Subteam

Review and agree upon draft proposal to create an expertise based UX subteam

The current Discovery Subteam is not sufficient in and of itself to handle the broad range of expertise needed to tackle the backlog and future work plan.
We want to separate the team into an expertise based Configuration team that makes changes in Primo and an expertise based UX team that does testing and provides feedback

4

SCP Question Regarding HathiTrust collections

What exactly is being asked?

What is the Discovery impact if SCP removes local HathiTrust portfolios?

What do they mean by “local”? Do they mean they’ll go into UCR’s portfolios and turn off what they don’t want?

SCP has 9677 local HathiTrust portfolio records (HathiTrust Digital Library (Local-OA) Collection ID: 61463249050006531) that were migrated as byproduct of titles from other licensed collections. These portfolios have been put into a local collection to be determined right after migration. SCP has not brought any HathiTrust link since migration. With the CDI activated for HathiTrust Digital Library Full View U.S. Only, SCP would like to remove all HathiTrust local portfolios.

5

6

7

Review Workplan/Issues or bring up potential future projects

8

Wrap up

Review actions and decisions

5

9

Parking Lot

Capture important topics for future discussion:

Discussion Parking Lot / Future Topics

10

Total

45

  • No labels